The roadmaps to managed competition: theory and practice

Context and relevanceEqual access to health care is a continuous concern for governments in developed countries.As systems are progressively confronted with the rise in healthcare costs, policymakers face growing financial pressures, which trigger regulatory responses.In this context, the managed competition model emerged, with its theoretical foundations established in Alain Enthoven's seminal (1978) work.This model gained traction during the 1990s, in what Cutler terms the third wave of 'medical care' reforms, responding to the perceived problems in healthcare systems (ie.increasing costs, inefficiencies, quality concerns), as well as dominant economic theory and the political climate (Cutler, 2002).These reforms focused on incentives, particularly competition, to promote efficiency and responsiveness to consumers.Nevertheless, there are substantive reasons for caution.Competitive markets tend towards risk rating, which can result in unaffordable costs for individuals with expensive medical conditions.Moreover, health care is often viewed as a 'right' or moral imperative (Handel and Ho, 2021), whereby market-based incentives might conflict with equity goals.As a result, competitive reforms have remained tentative.Influential country reforms included the Netherlands' Dekker Plan, which led to full implementation by 2006 (Schut and Van de Ven, 2011); the Clinton reform (Diamond, 1992); and reforms in Switzerland (Schneider, 1996).Notably, similar principles were implemented under different labels, with 'internal market' reforms in the UK NHS (Le Grand, 2009) and later in Sweden, New Zealand, and parts of Spain.In the last 30 years, the model of managed competition and its application have evolved.Both policymakers and health economists have strived to provide a theoretical framework in which the classical economic trade-off of equity and efficiency is balanced in the contemporaneous setting.Notable contributions include the work of Van de Ven et al. (2013), in which the authors developed a list of 10 preconditions to achieve the goals of equity and efficiency and evaluated their achievement in selected countries (Belgium, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands, and Switzerland); work by McGuire and Van Kleef (2018), which laid out categories of specific regulatory tools that are available to achieve the model and provide a comprehensive review of health plan payment in countries ranging from Australia, the USA, to China; and lastly, Van de Ven et al. 2024 follow-up study, which evaluated the progress of the five original countries over the 2012-2022 decade.This work reveals a series of theoretical and practical challenges this model faces currently.While it provides a solid economic foundation paired with regulatory tools to integrate aspects of

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Economics Policy and Law
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744133125100170
Primary Topic
Merger and Competition Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The roadmaps to managed competition: theory and practice

Shuli Brammli‐Greenberg, Maria Trottmann, Francesco Paolucci, Josefa Henríquez
Health Economics Policy and Law
Merger and Competition Analysis
article

The roadmaps to managed competition: theory and practice

Shuli Brammli‐Greenberg, Maria Trottmann, Francesco Paolucci, Josefa Henríquez
article en

Abstract

Context and relevanceEqual access to health care is a continuous concern for governments in developed countries.As systems are progressively confronted with the rise in healthcare costs, policymakers face growing financial pressures, which trigger regulatory responses.In this context, the managed competition model emerged, with its theoretical foundations established in Alain Enthoven's seminal (1978) work.This model gained traction during the 1990s, in what Cutler terms the third wave of 'medical care' reforms, responding to the perceived problems in healthcare systems (ie.increasing costs, inefficiencies, quality concerns), as well as dominant economic theory and the political climate (Cutler, 2002).These reforms focused on incentives, particularly competition, to promote efficiency and responsiveness to consumers.Nevertheless, there are substantive reasons for caution.Competitive markets tend towards risk rating, which can result in unaffordable costs for individuals with expensive medical conditions.Moreover, health care is often viewed as a 'right' or moral imperative (Handel and Ho, 2021), whereby market-based incentives might conflict with equity goals.As a result, competitive reforms have remained tentative.Influential country reforms included the Netherlands' Dekker Plan, which led to full implementation by 2006 (Schut and Van de Ven, 2011); the Clinton reform (Diamond, 1992); and reforms in Switzerland (Schneider, 1996).Notably, similar principles were implemented under different labels, with 'internal market' reforms in the UK NHS (Le Grand, 2009) and later in Sweden, New Zealand, and parts of Spain.In the last 30 years, the model of managed competition and its application have evolved.Both policymakers and health economists have strived to provide a theoretical framework in which the classical economic trade-off of equity and efficiency is balanced in the contemporaneous setting.Notable contributions include the work of Van de Ven et al. (2013), in which the authors developed a list of 10 preconditions to achieve the goals of equity and efficiency and evaluated their achievement in selected countries (Belgium, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands, and Switzerland); work by McGuire and Van Kleef (2018), which laid out categories of specific regulatory tools that are available to achieve the model and provide a comprehensive review of health plan payment in countries ranging from Australia, the USA, to China; and lastly, Van de Ven et al. 2024 follow-up study, which evaluated the progress of the five original countries over the 2012-2022 decade.This work reveals a series of theoretical and practical challenges this model faces currently.While it provides a solid economic foundation paired with regulatory tools to integrate aspects of

Health Economics Policy and LawVol. 20(2)
World Health Organization - Pakistan (PK), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), University of Newcastle Australia (AU), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Merger and Competition Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.