A Critical Commentary on the Characteristics of the Neo-Confucian Cultivation Theory in Dabu Written by Hanjae

The paper “Characteristics of the Neo-Confucian Cultivation Theory in Dabu Written by Hanjae” (Ji-Hyun Kim, Song-Hyun Choi, Pyong-In Yi), published in Korean Tea Society Journal Vol. 30, No. 3 (2024), presents several problems. These include misquotations and sophistry, arbitrary deductions about Neo-Confucianism, speculative and unclear arguments, and logical leaps and inconsistencies. If errors are made in quoting or in the theoretical framework, which is the core structure of the paper would hardly contribute to academic progress. Moreover, any damage caused by misquoting others and the resulting academic misunderstanding must also be considered. This paper critically examines the misquotations identified in the original text and highlights instances of strained reasoning, which together reveal the authors’ limited understanding of Neo-Confucian theory. It is hoped that this counterargument and the accompanying comments on “Characteristics of the Neo-Confucian Cultivation Theory in Dabu” will serve as material for reflection for the authors and as a useful reference for younger scholars developing their academic writing.

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Tea Society
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29225/jkts.2025.31.2.131
Primary Topic
Chinese history and philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Critical Commentary on the Characteristics of the Neo-Confucian Cultivation Theory in Dabu Written by Hanjae

The Korean Tea Society
Chinese history and philosophy
article

A Critical Commentary on the Characteristics of the Neo-Confucian Cultivation Theory in Dabu Written by Hanjae

article en

Abstract

The paper “Characteristics of the Neo-Confucian Cultivation Theory in Dabu Written by Hanjae” (Ji-Hyun Kim, Song-Hyun Choi, Pyong-In Yi), published in Korean Tea Society Journal Vol. 30, No. 3 (2024), presents several problems. These include misquotations and sophistry, arbitrary deductions about Neo-Confucianism, speculative and unclear arguments, and logical leaps and inconsistencies. If errors are made in quoting or in the theoretical framework, which is the core structure of the paper would hardly contribute to academic progress. Moreover, any damage caused by misquoting others and the resulting academic misunderstanding must also be considered. This paper critically examines the misquotations identified in the original text and highlights instances of strained reasoning, which together reveal the authors’ limited understanding of Neo-Confucian theory. It is hoped that this counterargument and the accompanying comments on “Characteristics of the Neo-Confucian Cultivation Theory in Dabu” will serve as material for reflection for the authors and as a useful reference for younger scholars developing their academic writing.

The Korean Tea SocietyVol. 31(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Chinese history and philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.