How computational thinking can be integrated in statistical learning: A cuboid framework

In the context of an increasingly data-intensive society, the integration of Computational Thinking (CT) into statistics education is essential to prepare students with the analytical and problem-solving competencies required for navigating complex data environments. Despite growing recognition of its importance, existing pedagogical practices frequently lack systematic didactical frameworks that effectively embed CT within statistical learning, particularly in higher education. Addressing this gap, the present study introduces a novel hypothetical didactical design—termed the Cuboid Framework—which systematically integrates CT components into the learning of descriptive statistics using the R programming language in a Google Colab environment. This research employed the Didactical Design Research (DDR) methodology, emphasizing the prospective and metapedadidactic stages to construct and evaluate the framework. Targeted at third-semester undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory statistics course, the Cuboid Framework aligns with learners’ developmental levels in both statistical reasoning and CT proficiency. The model is organized as a 5 × 4 × 4 structure, comprising five core statistical tasks, four structured didactical situations (action, formulation, validation, and institutionalization), and four CT elements (decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithmic thinking). Validation procedures included expert review through focus group discussions (FGDs) and an initial classroom implementation followed by metapedadidactic analysis. Findings reveal that the Cuboid Framework fosters a coherent learning progression, enhances students’ engagement in statistical inquiry, and supports the development of CT competencies. Classroom observations confirmed that the intentional design of didactical situations facilitates students’ cognitive adaptation to computational tasks. While preliminary analyses indicate strong theoretical and practical coherence, further retrospective studies and quantitative evaluations are necessary to ascertain the long-term effects on student learning outcomes. This study contributes a structured and theoretically grounded model for CT integration in statistics education, with implications for improving curriculum design and instructional practice in mathematics education. Future research should aim to test the scalability and efficacy of the Cuboid Framework across diverse educational settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal on Mathematics Education
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i2.pp423-448
Primary Topic
Statistics Education and Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How computational thinking can be integrated in statistical learning: A cuboid framework

Edi Irawan, Rizky Rosjanuardi, Sufyani Prabawanto
Journal on Mathematics Education
Statistics Education and Methodologies
article

How computational thinking can be integrated in statistical learning: A cuboid framework

Edi Irawan, Rizky Rosjanuardi, Sufyani Prabawanto
article en

Abstract

In the context of an increasingly data-intensive society, the integration of Computational Thinking (CT) into statistics education is essential to prepare students with the analytical and problem-solving competencies required for navigating complex data environments. Despite growing recognition of its importance, existing pedagogical practices frequently lack systematic didactical frameworks that effectively embed CT within statistical learning, particularly in higher education. Addressing this gap, the present study introduces a novel hypothetical didactical design—termed the Cuboid Framework—which systematically integrates CT components into the learning of descriptive statistics using the R programming language in a Google Colab environment. This research employed the Didactical Design Research (DDR) methodology, emphasizing the prospective and metapedadidactic stages to construct and evaluate the framework. Targeted at third-semester undergraduate students enrolled in an introductory statistics course, the Cuboid Framework aligns with learners’ developmental levels in both statistical reasoning and CT proficiency. The model is organized as a 5 × 4 × 4 structure, comprising five core statistical tasks, four structured didactical situations (action, formulation, validation, and institutionalization), and four CT elements (decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithmic thinking). Validation procedures included expert review through focus group discussions (FGDs) and an initial classroom implementation followed by metapedadidactic analysis. Findings reveal that the Cuboid Framework fosters a coherent learning progression, enhances students’ engagement in statistical inquiry, and supports the development of CT competencies. Classroom observations confirmed that the intentional design of didactical situations facilitates students’ cognitive adaptation to computational tasks. While preliminary analyses indicate strong theoretical and practical coherence, further retrospective studies and quantitative evaluations are necessary to ascertain the long-term effects on student learning outcomes. This study contributes a structured and theoretically grounded model for CT integration in statistics education, with implications for improving curriculum design and instructional practice in mathematics education. Future research should aim to test the scalability and efficacy of the Cuboid Framework across diverse educational settings.

Journal on Mathematics EducationVol. 16(2)
Indonesia University of Education (ID), Muhammadiyah University of Ponorogo (ID)
Kementerian Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Statistics Education and Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.