From Period Eye to Niche Eye: Re-situating Renaissance Painting in a Landscape of Affordances

Abstract In this article, I use current theorizsation in philosophy of mind to reappraise art historian Michael Baxandall’s account of the ‘period eye’. Baxandall coined this term to capture the culturally distinctive ways in which paintings were produced and perceived in fifteenth-century Renaissance Italy. Based on a critical reading of his cognitive-–perceptual account of pictorial apprehension, I argue that the period eye is essentially relational and therefore irreducible to the exercise of any capacity bound solely to the mind of an individual beholder. More specifically, I re-conceptualize the period eye as a set of affordances, or a niche, which comprises the possibilities for skilled action in the beholder’s material and socio-cultural environment. I also suggest that the term ‘niche eye’ better captures the phenomenon at stake and accommodates the possible co-existence of various equally appropriate ways of apprehending pictures during any given historical period.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Aesthetics
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayaf013
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Period Eye to Niche Eye: Re-situating Renaissance Painting in a Landscape of Affordances

Jussi A. Saarinen
The British Journal of Aesthetics
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
article

From Period Eye to Niche Eye: Re-situating Renaissance Painting in a Landscape of Affordances

Jussi A. Saarinen
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this article, I use current theorizsation in philosophy of mind to reappraise art historian Michael Baxandall’s account of the ‘period eye’. Baxandall coined this term to capture the culturally distinctive ways in which paintings were produced and perceived in fifteenth-century Renaissance Italy. Based on a critical reading of his cognitive-–perceptual account of pictorial apprehension, I argue that the period eye is essentially relational and therefore irreducible to the exercise of any capacity bound solely to the mind of an individual beholder. More specifically, I re-conceptualize the period eye as a set of affordances, or a niche, which comprises the possibilities for skilled action in the beholder’s material and socio-cultural environment. I also suggest that the term ‘niche eye’ better captures the phenomenon at stake and accommodates the possible co-existence of various equally appropriate ways of apprehending pictures during any given historical period.

The British Journal of AestheticsVol. 66(1)
University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Academy of Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.