C-247/23 Deldits: Gender Identity Through the Lens of the Right to Rectification of Personal Data

Case C‑247/23 Deldits, Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) of 13 March 2025<br/>Do individuals have a right to have the gender recorded in an EU Member State’s public register rectified to reflect the gender they identify with, if it was inaccurately recorded from the outset? According to the CJEU, if the purpose of recording their gender is to identify them, the short answer to this question is ‘yes’. With its ruling in Deldits, the Court not only correctly goes against a worrying trend to erase ‘gender’ from legal language. The CJEU also clarifies, for the first time, several key aspects of Article 16 GDPR: it confirms the purpose-dependent approach to accuracy and elaborates, albeit inconclusively, on the burden and standard of proof of (in)accuracy required under the said provision.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Data Protection Law Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2025/2/19
Primary Topic
Discrimination and Equality Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

C-247/23 Deldits: Gender Identity Through the Lens of the Right to Rectification of Personal Data

Andreas Häuselmann, Stephanie Rossello
European Data Protection Law Review
Discrimination and Equality Law
article

C-247/23 Deldits: Gender Identity Through the Lens of the Right to Rectification of Personal Data

Andreas Häuselmann, Stephanie Rossello
article en

Abstract

Case C‑247/23 Deldits, Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) of 13 March 2025<br/>Do individuals have a right to have the gender recorded in an EU Member State’s public register rectified to reflect the gender they identify with, if it was inaccurately recorded from the outset? According to the CJEU, if the purpose of recording their gender is to identify them, the short answer to this question is ‘yes’. With its ruling in Deldits, the Court not only correctly goes against a worrying trend to erase ‘gender’ from legal language. The CJEU also clarifies, for the first time, several key aspects of Article 16 GDPR: it confirms the purpose-dependent approach to accuracy and elaborates, albeit inconclusively, on the burden and standard of proof of (in)accuracy required under the said provision.

European Data Protection Law ReviewVol. 11(2)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Discrimination and Equality Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.