Networks and the City: A Network Perspective on Procopius <i>De Aed</i> . I and the Building of Late Antique Constantinople

Abstract Procopius of Caesarea’s work Buildings (ca. 550) is often used by archaeologists as a source of information on the building works of the eastern Roman emperor Justinian (r. 527–565 CE). Procopius’ own literary agenda, however, makes direct interpretation of the information he presents difficult, whether it comes to understanding the form of lost works, or understanding the historicity of his claims of patronage for Justinian. Network visualizations can provide an easy-to-interpret overview of differences between Procopius and information scattered throughout historiography in multiple languages, and other sources such as archaeology and epigraphy. In this work, we demonstrate the applicability of network theory by applying it to intra- and extratextual networks comprising urban patrons and building projects mentioned in Book 1 of the Buildings , on Constantinople. The clear diagrams generated as a result provide a “network perspective” on the complex historiographical and archaeological data, and provide a starting point for qualitative analysis of Procopius’s literary strategy. This in turn enhances the potential for informed use of the text as a source for historical reconstruction of the material past.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Archaeology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2025-0051
Primary Topic
Byzantine Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Networks and the City: A Network Perspective on Procopius De Aed . I and the Building of Late Antique Constantinople

Marlena Whiting, Marco Weppelmann-Akyildiz
Open Archaeology
Byzantine Studies and History
article

Networks and the City: A Network Perspective on Procopius De Aed . I and the Building of Late Antique Constantinople

Marlena Whiting, Marco Weppelmann-Akyildiz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Procopius of Caesarea’s work Buildings (ca. 550) is often used by archaeologists as a source of information on the building works of the eastern Roman emperor Justinian (r. 527–565 CE). Procopius’ own literary agenda, however, makes direct interpretation of the information he presents difficult, whether it comes to understanding the form of lost works, or understanding the historicity of his claims of patronage for Justinian. Network visualizations can provide an easy-to-interpret overview of differences between Procopius and information scattered throughout historiography in multiple languages, and other sources such as archaeology and epigraphy. In this work, we demonstrate the applicability of network theory by applying it to intra- and extratextual networks comprising urban patrons and building projects mentioned in Book 1 of the Buildings , on Constantinople. The clear diagrams generated as a result provide a “network perspective” on the complex historiographical and archaeological data, and provide a starting point for qualitative analysis of Procopius’s literary strategy. This in turn enhances the potential for informed use of the text as a source for historical reconstruction of the material past.

Open ArchaeologyVol. 11(1)
University of Groningen (NL), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Byzantine Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.