“There’s Something Wrong with You in the Head”: A Lacanian Reading of Justin Torres’s We the Animals

This article argues that the current critical consensus concerning Justin Torres’s We the Animals is mistaken in its assessment that the novel forges a liberatory pathway for queer individuals through radical displays of sexuality. Drawing from Lacanian psychoanalysis, it argues that the unnamed protagonist of the novel begins and ends his bildungsroman in a constant state of misrecognition and confusion as to what his social role might be in a phallocentric symbolic order. The overbearing presence of the phallus, his unsustainable fantasies of the imaginary and his mother, and his inability to forge an identity apart from the dictates of the phallic signifier, culminate in the re-emergence of infantile neurosis and his seclusion to a mental facility. This article also offers an alternative vision of queer liberation, drawn from Lee Edelman’s No Future, when the queer subject eventually learns to embody the death drive and to dismantle structures of heteronormativity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of American Studies
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4000/14eic
Primary Topic
Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“There’s Something Wrong with You in the Head”: A Lacanian Reading of Justin Torres’s We the Animals

Michael Justine Sales
European Journal of American Studies
Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
article

“There’s Something Wrong with You in the Head”: A Lacanian Reading of Justin Torres’s We the Animals

Michael Justine Sales
article en

Abstract

This article argues that the current critical consensus concerning Justin Torres’s We the Animals is mistaken in its assessment that the novel forges a liberatory pathway for queer individuals through radical displays of sexuality. Drawing from Lacanian psychoanalysis, it argues that the unnamed protagonist of the novel begins and ends his bildungsroman in a constant state of misrecognition and confusion as to what his social role might be in a phallocentric symbolic order. The overbearing presence of the phallus, his unsustainable fantasies of the imaginary and his mother, and his inability to forge an identity apart from the dictates of the phallic signifier, culminate in the re-emergence of infantile neurosis and his seclusion to a mental facility. This article also offers an alternative vision of queer liberation, drawn from Lee Edelman’s No Future, when the queer subject eventually learns to embody the death drive and to dismantle structures of heteronormativity.

European Journal of American StudiesVol. 20(2)
Georgetown University (US), Institut Pro Studium Literatury (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.