An Onto-Epistemic Inquiry Regarding Memory And Counter-Memory Of Modernist Architecture: Defects And Futility Against Norms And Causality

This research is a critical inquiry of the ontological and epistemological status of Modernist Architecture, and is based on the argument that such an inquiry can be made by directing to Modernist Architecture's memory and counter-memory.The central hypothesis is that, in addition to having a memory, Modernist Architecture also possesses a counter-memory; it actualizes itself through norms and causalities accumulated in its memory.However, it also possesses defects and futilities, and even though it cannot actualize itself through them, they continue to accumulate in the countermemory of Modernist Architecture.Counter-memory is a repository of the rejected, deprived, suppressed, and deferred qualities of Modernist Architecture, and exposes them in the late modern period.Norms and causality constitute a set of epistemes which encompass the agreed upon characteristics capable of validating Modernist Architecture at any given time, whereas defects and futility represent a distinct set of counterepistemes that encapsulate the singular, intuitive, heretical, and anomalous characteristics of Modernist Architecture.The aim of this research is to develop a methodology that allows for the appraisal of Modernist Architecture from both sets and, through this methodology, present a fallibilistic possibility for modernist architectural theory.To achieve this goal, the research is transformed into a research program framed by Imre Lakatos' methodology of research programmes.Within this program, the ontological and epistemological status of Modernist Architecture is examined through three categories: form, function, and meaning.In these categories, traces of norms and causality in the memory of Modernist Architecture, as well as traces of defects and futility in its counter-memory, are investigated.Among all the modern architectural practices that developed at the end of the 19 th century and rejected historicism, the Modernist Architecture occupied the most dominant position after 1920 with its rationalist,

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4305/metu.jfa.2025.1.10
Primary Topic
Architecture, Modernity, and Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Onto-Epistemic Inquiry Regarding Memory And Counter-Memory Of Modernist Architecture: Defects And Futility Against Norms And Causality

Joerg Gleiter, Senem Kaymaz
METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture
Architecture, Modernity, and Design
article

An Onto-Epistemic Inquiry Regarding Memory And Counter-Memory Of Modernist Architecture: Defects And Futility Against Norms And Causality

Joerg Gleiter, Senem Kaymaz
article en

Abstract

This research is a critical inquiry of the ontological and epistemological status of Modernist Architecture, and is based on the argument that such an inquiry can be made by directing to Modernist Architecture's memory and counter-memory.The central hypothesis is that, in addition to having a memory, Modernist Architecture also possesses a counter-memory; it actualizes itself through norms and causalities accumulated in its memory.However, it also possesses defects and futilities, and even though it cannot actualize itself through them, they continue to accumulate in the countermemory of Modernist Architecture.Counter-memory is a repository of the rejected, deprived, suppressed, and deferred qualities of Modernist Architecture, and exposes them in the late modern period.Norms and causality constitute a set of epistemes which encompass the agreed upon characteristics capable of validating Modernist Architecture at any given time, whereas defects and futility represent a distinct set of counterepistemes that encapsulate the singular, intuitive, heretical, and anomalous characteristics of Modernist Architecture.The aim of this research is to develop a methodology that allows for the appraisal of Modernist Architecture from both sets and, through this methodology, present a fallibilistic possibility for modernist architectural theory.To achieve this goal, the research is transformed into a research program framed by Imre Lakatos' methodology of research programmes.Within this program, the ontological and epistemological status of Modernist Architecture is examined through three categories: form, function, and meaning.In these categories, traces of norms and causality in the memory of Modernist Architecture, as well as traces of defects and futility in its counter-memory, are investigated.Among all the modern architectural practices that developed at the end of the 19 th century and rejected historicism, the Modernist Architecture occupied the most dominant position after 1920 with its rationalist,

METU Journal of the Faculty of ArchitectureVol. 42(1)
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Architecture, Modernity, and Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Onto-Epistemic Inquiry Regarding Memory And Counter-Memory Of Modernist Architecture: Defects And Futility Against Norms And Causality — Joerg Gleiter, Senem Kaymaz · METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS