Religiosidad, espiritualidad y estrategias cognitivas de regulación emocional en estudiantes de nivel superior

The aim of the present study was to analyze whether there are differences in the cognitive strategies of emotional regulation according to the level of spirituality and religiosity experienced by a sample of higher education students living in Argentina. A total of 191 subjects (48 men and 143 women) between 18 and 45 years of age (M = 24,14; SD = 4,77) participated. The Assessment of Spirituality and Religious Sentiments Scale (ASPIRES) by Simkin (2017) and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) by Medrano et al. (2013) were applied. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis test was applied as well to achieve the aforementioned objective. In relation to the level of religiosity, significant values were found in the dimensions positive reappraisal (p = 0,038) and refocus on planning (p = 0,002). Subjects with higher levels of religiosity presented higher scores in these adaptive strategies of emotional regulation. When analyzing differences in cognitive emotional regulation strategies as a function of spirituality, subjects with low prayer realization had higher scores on the maladaptive strategies: other-blame (p = 0,010), self-blame (p = 0,026), catastrophizing (p = 0,000), and rumination (p = 0,041). At the same time, significant values were obtained in positive reappraisal (p = 0,010) and positive refocusing (p = 0,030), with higher scores in these adaptive strategies for those subjects with higher prayer realization. On the universality dimension, high-scoring subjects had higher mean ranks on all adaptive strategies: acceptance (p = 0,041), putting in perspective (p = 0,014), positive reappraisal (p = 0,003), refocus on planning (p = 0,002), and positive focusing (p = 0,006). In conclusion, subjects with greater religiosity and spirituality would use more adaptive cognitive emotional regulation strategies. Implications of these findings for understanding how these aspects of religiosity and spirituality impact on cognitive emotional regulation in higher education students are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psíntesis
Published
2024-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56487/r3rk6c25
Primary Topic
Educational Methods and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Religiosidad, espiritualidad y estrategias cognitivas de regulación emocional en estudiantes de nivel superior

Mónica Serppe, Beatriz Wolff Mamede
Psíntesis
Educational Methods and Psychological Studies
article

Religiosidad, espiritualidad y estrategias cognitivas de regulación emocional en estudiantes de nivel superior

Mónica Serppe, Beatriz Wolff Mamede
article en

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to analyze whether there are differences in the cognitive strategies of emotional regulation according to the level of spirituality and religiosity experienced by a sample of higher education students living in Argentina. A total of 191 subjects (48 men and 143 women) between 18 and 45 years of age (M = 24,14; SD = 4,77) participated. The Assessment of Spirituality and Religious Sentiments Scale (ASPIRES) by Simkin (2017) and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) by Medrano et al. (2013) were applied. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis test was applied as well to achieve the aforementioned objective. In relation to the level of religiosity, significant values were found in the dimensions positive reappraisal (p = 0,038) and refocus on planning (p = 0,002). Subjects with higher levels of religiosity presented higher scores in these adaptive strategies of emotional regulation. When analyzing differences in cognitive emotional regulation strategies as a function of spirituality, subjects with low prayer realization had higher scores on the maladaptive strategies: other-blame (p = 0,010), self-blame (p = 0,026), catastrophizing (p = 0,000), and rumination (p = 0,041). At the same time, significant values were obtained in positive reappraisal (p = 0,010) and positive refocusing (p = 0,030), with higher scores in these adaptive strategies for those subjects with higher prayer realization. On the universality dimension, high-scoring subjects had higher mean ranks on all adaptive strategies: acceptance (p = 0,041), putting in perspective (p = 0,014), positive reappraisal (p = 0,003), refocus on planning (p = 0,002), and positive focusing (p = 0,006). In conclusion, subjects with greater religiosity and spirituality would use more adaptive cognitive emotional regulation strategies. Implications of these findings for understanding how these aspects of religiosity and spirituality impact on cognitive emotional regulation in higher education students are discussed.

PsíntesisVol. 1(1)
Universidad Adventista del Plata (AR), Universidad Católica del Uruguay (UY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Educational Methods and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.