Covariates of individual patient vital sign observation timeliness in hospital wards

Vital sign observations are typically carried out by healthcare staff at regular intervals, known as ward rounds, to monitor the overall health status of individual patients. Patients who present symptoms of deterioration, or are deemed ‘at risk’ by clinical staff, will have their vital signs observed more frequently (e.g., hourly instead of on a 12 hour interval), decided by the nature of their condition. The frequency and documentation accuracy of vital signs observations has been well studied, but less consideration has been given to how clinical staff manage specific observation intervals amongst those that have been routinely scheduled. The primary aims of this study are to assess the current adherence to prescribed observation intervals and identify any primary factors that affect timeliness. This study uses empirical survival estimation methods to determine the empirical likelihood that, for a patient with a specified observation interval, the subsequent observation would be recorded within the planned interval. We discuss the management of various patient observation intervals across 20 study wards in south Wales and how these formulate routine ward rounds, or coexist with them. A semi-parametric proportional hazards model is then used to determine the extent that individual patient covariates, such as Early Warning Score (EWS), time of day, and sepsis, mediate a significant change to the baseline of vital sign observation timeliness. At the ward level, our findings suggest regular batching of vital sign observations irrespective of the planned schedules and a moderately positive linear relationship between observation interval length and the likelihood of timely recording. On an individual patient basis, elevated EWS was the strongest indicator that a patient’s subsequent observation would be taken earlier than baseline, however, it is clear that baseline vital sign observation management is largely governed by existing ward round policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ichi64645.2025.00045
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Covariates of individual patient vital sign observation timeliness in hospital wards

Liam D. Turner, Beryl Noë, Stuart M. Allen, Rupert Ironside-Smith
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
article

Covariates of individual patient vital sign observation timeliness in hospital wards

Liam D. Turner, Beryl Noë, Stuart M. Allen, Rupert Ironside-Smith
article en

Abstract

Vital sign observations are typically carried out by healthcare staff at regular intervals, known as ward rounds, to monitor the overall health status of individual patients. Patients who present symptoms of deterioration, or are deemed ‘at risk’ by clinical staff, will have their vital signs observed more frequently (e.g., hourly instead of on a 12 hour interval), decided by the nature of their condition. The frequency and documentation accuracy of vital signs observations has been well studied, but less consideration has been given to how clinical staff manage specific observation intervals amongst those that have been routinely scheduled. The primary aims of this study are to assess the current adherence to prescribed observation intervals and identify any primary factors that affect timeliness. This study uses empirical survival estimation methods to determine the empirical likelihood that, for a patient with a specified observation interval, the subsequent observation would be recorded within the planned interval. We discuss the management of various patient observation intervals across 20 study wards in south Wales and how these formulate routine ward rounds, or coexist with them. A semi-parametric proportional hazards model is then used to determine the extent that individual patient covariates, such as Early Warning Score (EWS), time of day, and sepsis, mediate a significant change to the baseline of vital sign observation timeliness. At the ward level, our findings suggest regular batching of vital sign observations irrespective of the planned schedules and a moderately positive linear relationship between observation interval length and the likelihood of timely recording. On an individual patient basis, elevated EWS was the strongest indicator that a patient’s subsequent observation would be taken earlier than baseline, however, it is clear that baseline vital sign observation management is largely governed by existing ward round policies.

Cardiff University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Covariates of individual patient vital sign observation timeliness in hospital wards — Liam D. Turner, Beryl Noë, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS