Gradient-Based Reconciliation of Fairness and Performance in Healthcare AI

The enrichment of healthcare data coupled with advancements in computational capabilities has driven the adoption of artificial intelligence in healthcare. However, these approaches, when implemented without fairness considerations, may exacerbate existing disparities, leading to inequitable resource allocation and diagnostic inaccuracies across different demographic groups. This study introduces a novel approach via gradient projection to multi-attribute fairness optimization in healthcare AI, optimizing fairness across multiple demographic attributes and predictive performance concurrently. The approach aligns conflicting optimization objectives by projecting each gradient onto the normal plane of the other. Our method also enhances interpretability by elucidating the adjustments made during optimization, providing insights into trade-offs between fairness and accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ichi64645.2025.00081
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gradient-Based Reconciliation of Fairness and Performance in Healthcare AI

Xiaoyan Wang
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Gradient-Based Reconciliation of Fairness and Performance in Healthcare AI

Xiaoyan Wang
article en

Abstract

The enrichment of healthcare data coupled with advancements in computational capabilities has driven the adoption of artificial intelligence in healthcare. However, these approaches, when implemented without fairness considerations, may exacerbate existing disparities, leading to inequitable resource allocation and diagnostic inaccuracies across different demographic groups. This study introduces a novel approach via gradient projection to multi-attribute fairness optimization in healthcare AI, optimizing fairness across multiple demographic attributes and predictive performance concurrently. The approach aligns conflicting optimization objectives by projecting each gradient onto the normal plane of the other. Our method also enhances interpretability by elucidating the adjustments made during optimization, providing insights into trade-offs between fairness and accuracy.

Drexel University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.