Comprehensive Comparative Study of CPU, GPU, and TPU Performance for Neural Network Architectures Across Diverse Datasets

The rapid growth of deep learning (DL) applications, impacted by the increasing availability of data and computational demands, creates the necessity for efficient hardware solutions for training neural networks of varying complexities. This study conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis of CPU, GPU, and TPU performances across three neural network architectures: fully connected networks (FC), convolutional neural networks (CNN), and recurrent neural networks (RNN). Our experiments, conducted across six diverse datasets, examine key metrics such as training time, memory utilization, power efficiency, and throughput, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each hardware type across various neural network models and datasets. By analyzing results across hardware types, we provide insights into the practical advantages of each processor for different DL scenarios, which in turn assists developers and practitioners in selecting the most suitable hardware for their model requirements. Furthermore, our findings suggest potential areas for future hardware and software optimizations to further enhance DL performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/aiit63112.2025.11082797
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive Comparative Study of CPU, GPU, and TPU Performance for Neural Network Architectures Across Diverse Datasets

Laila Nassef, Asmaa Rashed Alahmari
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
article

Comprehensive Comparative Study of CPU, GPU, and TPU Performance for Neural Network Architectures Across Diverse Datasets

Laila Nassef, Asmaa Rashed Alahmari
article en

Abstract

The rapid growth of deep learning (DL) applications, impacted by the increasing availability of data and computational demands, creates the necessity for efficient hardware solutions for training neural networks of varying complexities. This study conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis of CPU, GPU, and TPU performances across three neural network architectures: fully connected networks (FC), convolutional neural networks (CNN), and recurrent neural networks (RNN). Our experiments, conducted across six diverse datasets, examine key metrics such as training time, memory utilization, power efficiency, and throughput, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each hardware type across various neural network models and datasets. By analyzing results across hardware types, we provide insights into the practical advantages of each processor for different DL scenarios, which in turn assists developers and practitioners in selecting the most suitable hardware for their model requirements. Furthermore, our findings suggest potential areas for future hardware and software optimizations to further enhance DL performance.

King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.