Cobots Designed for Strength, Not Stiffness

Conventional industrial robots are designed to be as stiff as possible to ensure high positioning accuracy. The stiffness of a structure is, however, strongly related to its mass, leading to heavy structures. This paper aims to quantify the potential gain of reducing and eliminating the stiffness constraints, which is of lesser importance for collaborative robots, by investigating the effect of applying different optimization objectives. The resulting optimized designs are quantitatively compared using a set of performance measures and evaluated against the traditional stiffness-designed approach. It was concluded that significant improvements can be made, e.g. the robot’s mass can be reduced up to 74% compared to traditionally stiff-designed robots. The dependency of the payload as well as the structural/actuator mass distribution on the optimized results is investigated and proved to have a significant influence on the potential improvements when allowing reduced structural rigidity. The relationship between structural mass and actuator mass is investigated and compared to commercially available cobots.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3591262
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cobots Designed for Strength, Not Stiffness

Bram Vanderborght, Greet Van de Perre, Thierry Hubert, Muhammad Usman et al.
2 citations
IEEE Access
Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
1.91
article

Cobots Designed for Strength, Not Stiffness

Bram Vanderborght, Greet Van de Perre, Thierry Hubert, Muhammad Usman, Amin Khorasani, Tom Verstraten, Raphaël Furnémont, Hafsa Nouhi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Conventional industrial robots are designed to be as stiff as possible to ensure high positioning accuracy. The stiffness of a structure is, however, strongly related to its mass, leading to heavy structures. This paper aims to quantify the potential gain of reducing and eliminating the stiffness constraints, which is of lesser importance for collaborative robots, by investigating the effect of applying different optimization objectives. The resulting optimized designs are quantitatively compared using a set of performance measures and evaluated against the traditional stiffness-designed approach. It was concluded that significant improvements can be made, e.g. the robot’s mass can be reduced up to 74% compared to traditionally stiff-designed robots. The dependency of the payload as well as the structural/actuator mass distribution on the optimized results is investigated and proved to have a significant influence on the potential improvements when allowing reduced structural rigidity. The relationship between structural mass and actuator mass is investigated and compared to commercially available cobots.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cobots Designed for Strength, Not Stiffness — Bram Vanderborght, Greet Van de Perre, et al. · IEEE Access (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS