Narrative-based assessment of university-level achievement

Narratives represent depictions of factual or fictional events that coherently incorporate explicit or implicit messages, meanings, and interpretations. Although they can play a significant role in the teaching and learning process at all levels of education, the evaluation methods for assessing student achievement through narratives are not always clearly defined. Therefore, the aim of this exploratory study is to examine the possibility of defining and applying assessment criteria for student responses presented in narrative form, in relation to the intended learning outcomes in the domains of knowledge acquisition and the development of socio-emotional competencies. The analysis was conducted on students? assigned narratives, in which they were required to describe personal experiences using concepts and theories covered in the lesson. The study presents assumptions for identifying assessment indicators, explicates their connection to educational goals and learning outcomes at both course and lesson levels, and introduces two main domains for evaluating student achievement: the acquisition of factual and conceptual knowledge and the assessment of socio-emotional sensitivity (including emotional awareness and expression, empathy/perspective-taking, and conflict resolution). The paper further provides a detailed explanation of the quantification process for each indicator and includes examples of student narratives that illustrate the proposed evaluation approach. Finally, the study highlights the advantages, as well as the limitations, of this method of student achievement assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zbornik Instituta za pedagoska istrazivanja
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2298/zipi2501099a
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Narrative-based assessment of university-level achievement

Slobodanka Antić, Barbara Blažanin
Zbornik Instituta za pedagoska istrazivanja
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Narrative-based assessment of university-level achievement

Slobodanka Antić, Barbara Blažanin
article en

Abstract

Narratives represent depictions of factual or fictional events that coherently incorporate explicit or implicit messages, meanings, and interpretations. Although they can play a significant role in the teaching and learning process at all levels of education, the evaluation methods for assessing student achievement through narratives are not always clearly defined. Therefore, the aim of this exploratory study is to examine the possibility of defining and applying assessment criteria for student responses presented in narrative form, in relation to the intended learning outcomes in the domains of knowledge acquisition and the development of socio-emotional competencies. The analysis was conducted on students? assigned narratives, in which they were required to describe personal experiences using concepts and theories covered in the lesson. The study presents assumptions for identifying assessment indicators, explicates their connection to educational goals and learning outcomes at both course and lesson levels, and introduces two main domains for evaluating student achievement: the acquisition of factual and conceptual knowledge and the assessment of socio-emotional sensitivity (including emotional awareness and expression, empathy/perspective-taking, and conflict resolution). The paper further provides a detailed explanation of the quantification process for each indicator and includes examples of student narratives that illustrate the proposed evaluation approach. Finally, the study highlights the advantages, as well as the limitations, of this method of student achievement assessment.

Zbornik Instituta za pedagoska istrazivanjaVol. 57(1)
University of Belgrade (RS)
Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.