Predictive factors and comparative analysis of surgical vs. endovascular treatment for spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: a 22-year experience at a neurovascular and spine center
Surgical treatment of SDAVF is generally safe and effective and shows superior outcomes compared to endovascular treatment; however, endovascular therapy remains an important option in special cases. Moreover, the time interval between MRI-based diagnosis and surgical or endovascular treatment plays a critical role in determining long-term clinical outcomes of SDAVF patients.
Authors
- Kay Engellandt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3569-6979)
- Dino Podlesek (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5518-6496)
- Mido Max Hijazi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0442-185X)
- Andreas Filis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4753-7046)
- Tareq Adnan Juratli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2236-6719)
- Ilker Y. Eyüpoglu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8185-7764)
- Sergio M. F. Romualdo
- Penelope Felgenhauer
Institutions
- University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Brain and Spine
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2025.104335
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.78