The effect of different cage densities on selected stress and welfare indicators in brown and white laying hens

This study investigated the impact of different cage densities (750 cm 2 /hen, 535 cm 2 /hen, and 375 cm 2 /hen) on stress and welfare indicators in brown (Hyline Brown, HB) and white (Isa Tinted, IT) laying hens. The research focused on evaluating feather, health, and body condition scores, along with the heterophil-to-lymphocyte (H/L) ratio, as indicators of stress and welfare. Our results revealed a significant effect of cage density on feather scores, with higher densities correlating with increased feather loss across all body regions ( P < 0.01). Furthermore, elevated cage densities were associated with a higher incidence of injuries in the cloaca and foot regions, as well as poorer body condition scores ( P < 0.01). Notably, the HB hybrid consistently exhibited superior welfare indicators compared to the IT hybrid, as evidenced by higher feather scores, and higher body condition scores. With the increase in cage density, an increase in the H/L ratio was observed, and accordingly, an increase in stress intensity was determined ( P < 0.01). These findings underscore the complex relationship between cage density, genotype, stress, and welfare outcomes in laying hens, emphasizing the need for further research to elucidate these interactions and develop targeted strategies for improving laying hen welfare in commercial production systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Veterinaria Brno
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2754/avb202594020145
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of different cage densities on selected stress and welfare indicators in brown and white laying hens

Uğur Özentürk, Ekrem Laçin, Ayşe Uysal, Burak Batuhan Lacın
Acta Veterinaria Brno
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

The effect of different cage densities on selected stress and welfare indicators in brown and white laying hens

Uğur Özentürk, Ekrem Laçin, Ayşe Uysal, Burak Batuhan Lacın
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of different cage densities (750 cm 2 /hen, 535 cm 2 /hen, and 375 cm 2 /hen) on stress and welfare indicators in brown (Hyline Brown, HB) and white (Isa Tinted, IT) laying hens. The research focused on evaluating feather, health, and body condition scores, along with the heterophil-to-lymphocyte (H/L) ratio, as indicators of stress and welfare. Our results revealed a significant effect of cage density on feather scores, with higher densities correlating with increased feather loss across all body regions ( P < 0.01). Furthermore, elevated cage densities were associated with a higher incidence of injuries in the cloaca and foot regions, as well as poorer body condition scores ( P < 0.01). Notably, the HB hybrid consistently exhibited superior welfare indicators compared to the IT hybrid, as evidenced by higher feather scores, and higher body condition scores. With the increase in cage density, an increase in the H/L ratio was observed, and accordingly, an increase in stress intensity was determined ( P < 0.01). These findings underscore the complex relationship between cage density, genotype, stress, and welfare outcomes in laying hens, emphasizing the need for further research to elucidate these interactions and develop targeted strategies for improving laying hen welfare in commercial production systems.

Acta Veterinaria BrnoVol. 94(2)
Atatürk University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.