Crisis management: from values to humanitarian technology

The article attempts to analyze various management situations of introducing values and humanitarian technologies into management rationality as different, often opposite, ways of crisis management. The contextuality of the meanings of the concept “value” and the connection between value issues and the analysis of various types of rationality are analyzed. The syncretism of values and technologies in anti-crisis management in an organization is described. Value is designated here as an element of corporate culture, as reasons and motives for certain organizational behavior. Here, values are interpreted in an instrumental-rational context. Attention is drawn to the fact that in social and public administration, value can be associated with value rationality and contrasted with technologies, including humanitarian ones. The objectification of values determines the value rationality of crisis management; it is often in demand for the purposes of social consolidation, but the real content of management practice turns out to be instrumental-technical rationality, integrating the value aspect of management through social and humanitarian technologies. It is shown how values and technologies can mutually converge into instrumental-technological rationality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
THE KAZAN SOCIALLY-HUMANITARIAN BULLETIN
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26907/2079-5912.2025.2.88-95
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crisis management: from values to humanitarian technology

Резида Масхутовна Нигоматуллина
THE KAZAN SOCIALLY-HUMANITARIAN BULLETIN
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

Crisis management: from values to humanitarian technology

Резида Масхутовна Нигоматуллина
article en

Abstract

The article attempts to analyze various management situations of introducing values and humanitarian technologies into management rationality as different, often opposite, ways of crisis management. The contextuality of the meanings of the concept “value” and the connection between value issues and the analysis of various types of rationality are analyzed. The syncretism of values and technologies in anti-crisis management in an organization is described. Value is designated here as an element of corporate culture, as reasons and motives for certain organizational behavior. Here, values are interpreted in an instrumental-rational context. Attention is drawn to the fact that in social and public administration, value can be associated with value rationality and contrasted with technologies, including humanitarian ones. The objectification of values determines the value rationality of crisis management; it is often in demand for the purposes of social consolidation, but the real content of management practice turns out to be instrumental-technical rationality, integrating the value aspect of management through social and humanitarian technologies. It is shown how values and technologies can mutually converge into instrumental-technological rationality.

THE KAZAN SOCIALLY-HUMANITARIAN BULLETIN(2(69))
Kazan Federal University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.