The Paternalistic Model of Assistance: Problems and Prospects (A Socio-Philosophical Analysis)

The article critically examines the paternalistic model of assistance in the context of modern cultural, technological, and ethical transformations. The author explores the contradictions of classical paternalism, based on the "subject–object" hierarchy, and alternative approaches emphasizing joint agency. Using an interdisciplinary methodology (poststructuralism, Karen Barad’s intra–action theory, Bruno Latour’s actor–network theory), the study reveals the role of technologies, such as AI diagnostics, in reviving paternalistic practices. Special attention is paid to epistemic injustice, dehumanization of medical interactions, and resistance through self–help. The conclusion highlights the need to integrate technological progress with an ethics of reciprocity and horizontal solidarity to preserve the humanistic dimension of care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
THE KAZAN SOCIALLY-HUMANITARIAN BULLETIN
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26907/2079-5912.2025.2.73-80
Primary Topic
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Paternalistic Model of Assistance: Problems and Prospects (A Socio-Philosophical Analysis)

R. V. Vasyukov
THE KAZAN SOCIALLY-HUMANITARIAN BULLETIN
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
article

The Paternalistic Model of Assistance: Problems and Prospects (A Socio-Philosophical Analysis)

R. V. Vasyukov
article en

Abstract

The article critically examines the paternalistic model of assistance in the context of modern cultural, technological, and ethical transformations. The author explores the contradictions of classical paternalism, based on the "subject–object" hierarchy, and alternative approaches emphasizing joint agency. Using an interdisciplinary methodology (poststructuralism, Karen Barad’s intra–action theory, Bruno Latour’s actor–network theory), the study reveals the role of technologies, such as AI diagnostics, in reviving paternalistic practices. Special attention is paid to epistemic injustice, dehumanization of medical interactions, and resistance through self–help. The conclusion highlights the need to integrate technological progress with an ethics of reciprocity and horizontal solidarity to preserve the humanistic dimension of care.

THE KAZAN SOCIALLY-HUMANITARIAN BULLETIN(2(69))
Russian State Social University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.