Assessing Short-Term Memory with Different Memory Modalities in Mild Cognitive Impairment

Background Mild cognitive function (MCI) is associated with a declined short-term memory (STM).This study compared STM between adults with MCI and normal cognition assessed by verbal memory vs visuospatial memory.Methods Sixteen subjects with MCI and 11 subjects with normal cognition gave their written consent to participate in the study which was approved by the North Texas Regional IRB.Subjects having a self-or family member-reported memory complaint, whose clinical dementia rating was 0.5, and/or whose testing scores in two or more cognitive domains were below the age-/education-adjusted group averages, were determined to have MCI.Digit-Span-Test (DST) and California-Verbal-Learning-Test (CVLT-II) were assessed for digit-verbal memory and word-verbal memory, respectively.Brief-Visuospatial-Memory-Test-Revised (BVMT-R) was performed for visuospatial memory.Values from the MCI and normal groups were compared using t-tests.Two-factor ANOVA was applied to test the significance of the group factor (i.e., MCI vs normal) and the trial factor (i.e., trials 1-4 in CVLT-II and trials 1-3 in BVMT-R).Results Neither group age nor education attainment was different in MCI vs normal (71.31.6 vs 67.91.7 years old).Although MMSE scores were not different between the groups, Trail-Making-Test performance was significantly poorer in the MCI.DST-Sequencing scores were lower (P = 0.011) in the MCI (4.80.4)vs normal (6.40.3)subjects.However, neither DST-Forward nor DST-Backward scores differed between the groups.CVLT-II immediate free-recall and BVMT-R recall scores were consistently superior in the normal vs MCI subjects (group factor P<0.001) and improved significantly with trial repetitions (trial factor P<0.001) in both groups.The rates of performance improvement with repeated CVLT-II and BVMT-R trials were similar in the groups, indicating similar learning effects.Both 30-s short-delayed and 10-min longdelayed free-recall scores in CVLT-II and 30-min delayed recall scores in BVMT-R were significantly lower in the MCI vs normal subjects (CVLT-II short-delayed: 6.90.3 vs 8.40.2 [P<0.001];longdelayed: 5.90.4vs 8.20.3 [P<0.001], and BVMT-R delayed recall: 5.10.9vs 7.90.5,[P = 0.021]).Conclusions Both the verbal memory and visuospatial memory are significantly diminished, but learning ability may be preserved in MCI.CVLT-II seems to be more specific and/or sensitive for detecting MCI-related difference in STM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-07-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51219/urforum.2025.xiangrong-shi
Primary Topic
Cognitive Functions and Memory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Short-Term Memory with Different Memory Modalities in Mild Cognitive Impairment

Xiangrong Shi
Cognitive Functions and Memory
article

Assessing Short-Term Memory with Different Memory Modalities in Mild Cognitive Impairment

Xiangrong Shi
article en

Abstract

Background Mild cognitive function (MCI) is associated with a declined short-term memory (STM).This study compared STM between adults with MCI and normal cognition assessed by verbal memory vs visuospatial memory.Methods Sixteen subjects with MCI and 11 subjects with normal cognition gave their written consent to participate in the study which was approved by the North Texas Regional IRB.Subjects having a self-or family member-reported memory complaint, whose clinical dementia rating was 0.5, and/or whose testing scores in two or more cognitive domains were below the age-/education-adjusted group averages, were determined to have MCI.Digit-Span-Test (DST) and California-Verbal-Learning-Test (CVLT-II) were assessed for digit-verbal memory and word-verbal memory, respectively.Brief-Visuospatial-Memory-Test-Revised (BVMT-R) was performed for visuospatial memory.Values from the MCI and normal groups were compared using t-tests.Two-factor ANOVA was applied to test the significance of the group factor (i.e., MCI vs normal) and the trial factor (i.e., trials 1-4 in CVLT-II and trials 1-3 in BVMT-R).Results Neither group age nor education attainment was different in MCI vs normal (71.31.6 vs 67.91.7 years old).Although MMSE scores were not different between the groups, Trail-Making-Test performance was significantly poorer in the MCI.DST-Sequencing scores were lower (P = 0.011) in the MCI (4.80.4)vs normal (6.40.3)subjects.However, neither DST-Forward nor DST-Backward scores differed between the groups.CVLT-II immediate free-recall and BVMT-R recall scores were consistently superior in the normal vs MCI subjects (group factor P<0.001) and improved significantly with trial repetitions (trial factor P<0.001) in both groups.The rates of performance improvement with repeated CVLT-II and BVMT-R trials were similar in the groups, indicating similar learning effects.Both 30-s short-delayed and 10-min longdelayed free-recall scores in CVLT-II and 30-min delayed recall scores in BVMT-R were significantly lower in the MCI vs normal subjects (CVLT-II short-delayed: 6.90.3 vs 8.40.2 [P<0.001];longdelayed: 5.90.4vs 8.20.3 [P<0.001], and BVMT-R delayed recall: 5.10.9vs 7.90.5,[P = 0.021]).Conclusions Both the verbal memory and visuospatial memory are significantly diminished, but learning ability may be preserved in MCI.CVLT-II seems to be more specific and/or sensitive for detecting MCI-related difference in STM.

University of North Texas (US), University of North Texas Health Science Center (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Cognitive Functions and Memory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.