Brennt unser Haus oder hat die Erde Fieber? Krankheits- und Feuermetaphorik im deutschen Klimawandeldiskurs

In recent years, climate change has emerged as one of the most important political, economic and societal issues in Germany. Due to its thematic complexity and its controversial nature, the climate change discourse is considered to be a particularly suitable subject for linguistic discourse analysis. This article deals with the use of metaphors in public German climate change discourse. The analysis focuses on the disease and fire metaphors used in the climate discourse and the questions of which conceptualisations these are part of and for what purposes they are used. On the basis of the analysis, it can be stated that climate change is often conceptualised as a DISEASE or a FIRE and is thus presented as an existential danger and evaluated negatively. Climate protection measures are positively framed as they are often conceptualised as a REMEDY or FIRE PROTECTION / FIRE FIGHTING.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ARGUMENTUM
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34103/argumentum/2025/4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health and Medical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brennt unser Haus oder hat die Erde Fieber? Krankheits- und Feuermetaphorik im deutschen Klimawandeldiskurs

Elisabeth Putterer
1 citations
ARGUMENTUM
Health and Medical Studies
2.82
article

Brennt unser Haus oder hat die Erde Fieber? Krankheits- und Feuermetaphorik im deutschen Klimawandeldiskurs

Elisabeth Putterer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In recent years, climate change has emerged as one of the most important political, economic and societal issues in Germany. Due to its thematic complexity and its controversial nature, the climate change discourse is considered to be a particularly suitable subject for linguistic discourse analysis. This article deals with the use of metaphors in public German climate change discourse. The analysis focuses on the disease and fire metaphors used in the climate discourse and the questions of which conceptualisations these are part of and for what purposes they are used. On the basis of the analysis, it can be stated that climate change is often conceptualised as a DISEASE or a FIRE and is thus presented as an existential danger and evaluated negatively. Climate protection measures are positively framed as they are often conceptualised as a REMEDY or FIRE PROTECTION / FIRE FIGHTING.

ARGUMENTUMVol. 21
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health and Medical Studies
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.