Rethinking transitional justice in Colombia: legal architecture, structural tensions and the challenge of its integration as public policy (1991-2024)

This article examines the legal evolution and institutional challenges of transitional justice in Colombia from 1991 to 2024, within the broader framework of the State's efforts to build a sustainable peace. Grounded in a theoretical approach that conceives transitional justice as a normative public policy duty, the study critically analyzes the normative fragmentation, weak implementation, and lack of inter-institutional coordination of the transitional justice mechanisms adopted in Colombia. It identifies three key normative phases, describes five structural tensions (centralism, punitive bias, legal dispersion, funding deficits, and socio-economic omission), and proposes a in multilevel governance and territorial inclusion. The article concludes that despite important constitutional and legislative progress, Colombia has yet to consolidate a coherent and sustainable public policy of transitional justice, and its future success depends on broader institutional articulation, social inclusion, and long-term programmatic vision. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52783/rcp.1212

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52783/rcp.1212
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking transitional justice in Colombia: legal architecture, structural tensions and the challenge of its integration as public policy (1991-2024)

1 citations
Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
8.52
article

Rethinking transitional justice in Colombia: legal architecture, structural tensions and the challenge of its integration as public policy (1991-2024)

article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article examines the legal evolution and institutional challenges of transitional justice in Colombia from 1991 to 2024, within the broader framework of the State's efforts to build a sustainable peace. Grounded in a theoretical approach that conceives transitional justice as a normative public policy duty, the study critically analyzes the normative fragmentation, weak implementation, and lack of inter-institutional coordination of the transitional justice mechanisms adopted in Colombia. It identifies three key normative phases, describes five structural tensions (centralism, punitive bias, legal dispersion, funding deficits, and socio-economic omission), and proposes a in multilevel governance and territorial inclusion. The article concludes that despite important constitutional and legislative progress, Colombia has yet to consolidate a coherent and sustainable public policy of transitional justice, and its future success depends on broader institutional articulation, social inclusion, and long-term programmatic vision. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52783/rcp.1212

Review of Contemporary Philosophy
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rethinking transitional justice in Colombia: legal architecture, structural tensions and the challenge of its integration as public policy (1991-2024) · Review of Contemporary Philosophy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS