Measuring The Validity of Unilateral Non-Competition Clauses in Employment Agreements: A Civil and Employment Law Perspective

This article examines the non-competition clause in employment agreements, particularly in the context of industrial inequality and the protection of workers' constitutional rights. Through a normative juridical approach and analysis of the Central Jakarta Court of International Relations (PHI) Decision No. 106/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019/PN.Jkt.Pst. This article shows that non-competition clauses that are not proportionately arranged and without proper compensation can be declared null and void because they violate the principle of balance and the principle of the right to work. The ruling marks a paradigm shift in the court from a formalistic to a substantial approach in assessing employment contracts. The findings in this article also underscore the importance of regulatory reform and legal education for workers, in order to prevent exploitative clauses in employment agreements. This article recommends that treaty law in the context of employment should always be subject to the principles of substantive justice and protection of the weak.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances In Social Humanities Research
Published
2025-06-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46799/adv.v3i5.436
Primary Topic
International Labor and Employment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring The Validity of Unilateral Non-Competition Clauses in Employment Agreements: A Civil and Employment Law Perspective

Kornelia Rismarini, Bella Nadhillah Rachmania, Verly Arizal
Advances In Social Humanities Research
International Labor and Employment Law
article

Measuring The Validity of Unilateral Non-Competition Clauses in Employment Agreements: A Civil and Employment Law Perspective

Kornelia Rismarini, Bella Nadhillah Rachmania, Verly Arizal
article en

Abstract

This article examines the non-competition clause in employment agreements, particularly in the context of industrial inequality and the protection of workers' constitutional rights. Through a normative juridical approach and analysis of the Central Jakarta Court of International Relations (PHI) Decision No. 106/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019/PN.Jkt.Pst. This article shows that non-competition clauses that are not proportionately arranged and without proper compensation can be declared null and void because they violate the principle of balance and the principle of the right to work. The ruling marks a paradigm shift in the court from a formalistic to a substantial approach in assessing employment contracts. The findings in this article also underscore the importance of regulatory reform and legal education for workers, in order to prevent exploitative clauses in employment agreements. This article recommends that treaty law in the context of employment should always be subject to the principles of substantive justice and protection of the weak.

Advances In Social Humanities ResearchVol. 3(5)
Pelita Harapan University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
International Labor and Employment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.