Hotspots and Developmental Trends in the Research of National Security Education in China

本研究旨在探讨我国国家安全教育研究的热点和发展趋势。通过文献计量法分析CNKI数据库中2001~2025年间的995篇相关文献,研究发现:年度发文量呈上升趋势,核心期刊数量较少;研究机构多样化,但作者和机构间合作较少;研究热点集中在高校国家安全教育、学科建设和实施路径,易受政策和时代背景影响。未来研究应加强合作,拓宽研究对象,丰富边疆和中小学研究内容,推动国家安全教育学科发展与实践创新。This study aims to explore the hotspots and developmental trends of national security education research in China. Through bibliometric analysis of 995 relevant papers from 2001 to 2025 in the CNKI database, the findings reveal: Annual publication volume shows an upward trend, but the proportion of core journals is relatively low; Research institutions are diverse, yet collaboration among authors and institutions is limited; Research focuses on national security education in universities, discipline construction, and implementation pathways, shaped by policy and historical contexts. Future research should strengthen collaboration, expand the scope to include border areas and primary/secondary schools, and promote the development and practice of national security education disciplines.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Social Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.147633
Primary Topic
Innovative Educational Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hotspots and Developmental Trends in the Research of National Security Education in China

权有 蔡
Advances in Social Sciences
Innovative Educational Techniques
article

Hotspots and Developmental Trends in the Research of National Security Education in China

权有 蔡
article en

Abstract

本研究旨在探讨我国国家安全教育研究的热点和发展趋势。通过文献计量法分析CNKI数据库中2001~2025年间的995篇相关文献,研究发现:年度发文量呈上升趋势,核心期刊数量较少;研究机构多样化,但作者和机构间合作较少;研究热点集中在高校国家安全教育、学科建设和实施路径,易受政策和时代背景影响。未来研究应加强合作,拓宽研究对象,丰富边疆和中小学研究内容,推动国家安全教育学科发展与实践创新。This study aims to explore the hotspots and developmental trends of national security education research in China. Through bibliometric analysis of 995 relevant papers from 2001 to 2025 in the CNKI database, the findings reveal: Annual publication volume shows an upward trend, but the proportion of core journals is relatively low; Research institutions are diverse, yet collaboration among authors and institutions is limited; Research focuses on national security education in universities, discipline construction, and implementation pathways, shaped by policy and historical contexts. Future research should strengthen collaboration, expand the scope to include border areas and primary/secondary schools, and promote the development and practice of national security education disciplines.

Advances in Social SciencesVol. 14(07)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Innovative Educational Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hotspots and Developmental Trends in the Research of National Security Education in China — 权有 蔡 · Advances in Social Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS