AI Regulation for Ecuador

Generative AI has emerged exponentially. However, countries should prepare the administrative conditions to face the challenges and risks of AI. This research explores the regulatory design and governance processes of Artificial Intelligence (AI) at the European and American levels to compare them with the practices implemented in Ecuador from 2021-2024 by analyzing the role of institutions in this process and the results generated. It used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to pick up scientific documents. Data were chosen from three databases: IEEE Digital Library, Scopus, and Science Direct; furthermore, the theoretical Lens of Normative Institutionalism was applied to analyze the social relations of actors for the practice executed in Ecuador, front to international practices. Outcomes found that the standard practices between different countries around the world are based on (i) fairness, (ii) reliability, safety, and control, (iii) privacy and security, (iv) inclusiveness, (v) transparency, (vi) accountability and (vii) in pursuit of human benefits and happiness. In Ecuador, the road map has started to agree with international trends. However, future efforts will require mapping current institutional capacities and existing legal structures to determine what can be used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icedeg65568.2025.11081572
Primary Topic
Business, Innovation, and Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Regulation for Ecuador

María Fernanda Linzán Saltos, Mercedes Navarro Cejas, Jaime Meza, Elkin Uday Velastegui Campoverde et al.
Business, Innovation, and Economy
article

AI Regulation for Ecuador

María Fernanda Linzán Saltos, Mercedes Navarro Cejas, Jaime Meza, Elkin Uday Velastegui Campoverde, Valeria Carolina Argüello Castro
article en

Abstract

Generative AI has emerged exponentially. However, countries should prepare the administrative conditions to face the challenges and risks of AI. This research explores the regulatory design and governance processes of Artificial Intelligence (AI) at the European and American levels to compare them with the practices implemented in Ecuador from 2021-2024 by analyzing the role of institutions in this process and the results generated. It used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) to pick up scientific documents. Data were chosen from three databases: IEEE Digital Library, Scopus, and Science Direct; furthermore, the theoretical Lens of Normative Institutionalism was applied to analyze the social relations of actors for the practice executed in Ecuador, front to international practices. Outcomes found that the standard practices between different countries around the world are based on (i) fairness, (ii) reliability, safety, and control, (iii) privacy and security, (iv) inclusiveness, (v) transparency, (vi) accountability and (vii) in pursuit of human benefits and happiness. In Ecuador, the road map has started to agree with international trends. However, future efforts will require mapping current institutional capacities and existing legal structures to determine what can be used.

Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Ecuador (EC), Universidad Técnica de Manabí (EC)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Business, Innovation, and Economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.