Taxonomy of Existing Sustainable Smart City IoT Projects

There has been a significant increase in the inclusion of the Internet of Things (IoT) into systems that affect everyone daily. The lessons learned from past experiences (i.e., case studies) can give a clearer understanding of the various options useful for potential improvements. Moreover, given the diversity of projects across privately funded versus government-funded, we took an independent, objective and scientific approach to understanding the differences comparatively. Starting with the funding sources and feature rationale, a clearer picture has emerged. Consequently, the composite picture enables a different, perhaps more valuable, baseline from which to develop future smart city strategies. Moreover, there can be many positives and negatives to the way these projects were implemented and carried out (i.e., commercial and political stakes). This study was limited from the post-implementation perspective, which emphasizes success stories, an inherent bias, as well as a disparity in level-of-funding available for each of the projects. Nevertheless, we have provided an original and consolidated perspective of the project outcomes and results. This represents a useful opportunity to explore an array of Smart City implementations that depend on evolving IoT technology solutions. Unfortunately, not all solutions being employed today are interoperable and/or extensible in an open systems sense. Modification, extensions, and support toward addressing emerging needs and achieving better more sustainable community mobility therefore may be disadvantaged and/or impeded; Thus, to better manage the expectations of Smart City planners and developers, this article has assessed and organized the outcomes of the eight projects posthumously and comparatively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3591230
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.14
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taxonomy of Existing Sustainable Smart City IoT Projects

Frederick T. Sheldon, Bhaskar Prasad Rimal, Ananth A. Jillepalli, Ahmed Abdel-Rahim et al.
1 citations
IEEE Access
Smart Cities and Technologies
1.14
article

Taxonomy of Existing Sustainable Smart City IoT Projects

Frederick T. Sheldon, Bhaskar Prasad Rimal, Ananth A. Jillepalli, Ahmed Abdel-Rahim, M. L. Cox, Youssef Saleh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There has been a significant increase in the inclusion of the Internet of Things (IoT) into systems that affect everyone daily. The lessons learned from past experiences (i.e., case studies) can give a clearer understanding of the various options useful for potential improvements. Moreover, given the diversity of projects across privately funded versus government-funded, we took an independent, objective and scientific approach to understanding the differences comparatively. Starting with the funding sources and feature rationale, a clearer picture has emerged. Consequently, the composite picture enables a different, perhaps more valuable, baseline from which to develop future smart city strategies. Moreover, there can be many positives and negatives to the way these projects were implemented and carried out (i.e., commercial and political stakes). This study was limited from the post-implementation perspective, which emphasizes success stories, an inherent bias, as well as a disparity in level-of-funding available for each of the projects. Nevertheless, we have provided an original and consolidated perspective of the project outcomes and results. This represents a useful opportunity to explore an array of Smart City implementations that depend on evolving IoT technology solutions. Unfortunately, not all solutions being employed today are interoperable and/or extensible in an open systems sense. Modification, extensions, and support toward addressing emerging needs and achieving better more sustainable community mobility therefore may be disadvantaged and/or impeded; Thus, to better manage the expectations of Smart City planners and developers, this article has assessed and organized the outcomes of the eight projects posthumously and comparatively.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
University of Idaho (US), Idaho National Laboratory (US), Washington State University (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Smart Cities and Technologies
1.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.