Analysis of Google Play Store User Sentiment Towards Application X Using the SVM Algorithm

This study uses the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm to examine user opinions about the X app on the Google Play Store. Data went through preprocessing steps like cleaning, casefolding, tokenizing, filtering, and sentence reconstruction from 5,000 reviews that were gathered via web scraping. Using a lexicon-based method, sentiment labeling was carried out, categorizing reviews into three groups: neutral, negative, and positive. The findings indicated that 49.4% of respondents had unfavorable opinion, followed by neutral (29.8%) and positive (20.8%). An SVM model with an accuracy of 86.3% was generated by feature extraction using Bag of Words with CountVectorizer. The neutral class had the highest recall (0.96) and the negative class the highest precision (0.95). With an F1-score of 0.78, the positive class performed the worst, most likely as a result of data imbalance. Despite difficulties in categorizing minority classes, this study shows that SVM is useful in sentiment analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brilliance Research of Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47709/brilliance.v5i1.6024
Primary Topic
Customer churn and segmentation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Google Play Store User Sentiment Towards Application X Using the SVM Algorithm

Mohammad Nazir Arifin, Miftachul Huda, Nur Hasanah, Amir Hamzah
Brilliance Research of Artificial Intelligence
Customer churn and segmentation
article

Analysis of Google Play Store User Sentiment Towards Application X Using the SVM Algorithm

Mohammad Nazir Arifin, Miftachul Huda, Nur Hasanah, Amir Hamzah
article en

Abstract

This study uses the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm to examine user opinions about the X app on the Google Play Store. Data went through preprocessing steps like cleaning, casefolding, tokenizing, filtering, and sentence reconstruction from 5,000 reviews that were gathered via web scraping. Using a lexicon-based method, sentiment labeling was carried out, categorizing reviews into three groups: neutral, negative, and positive. The findings indicated that 49.4% of respondents had unfavorable opinion, followed by neutral (29.8%) and positive (20.8%). An SVM model with an accuracy of 86.3% was generated by feature extraction using Bag of Words with CountVectorizer. The neutral class had the highest recall (0.96) and the negative class the highest precision (0.95). With an F1-score of 0.78, the positive class performed the worst, most likely as a result of data imbalance. Despite difficulties in categorizing minority classes, this study shows that SVM is useful in sentiment analysis.

Brilliance Research of Artificial IntelligenceVol. 5(1)
Universitas Madura (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Customer churn and segmentation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.