Experimental philosophy and experimental bioethics: an estimate

Abstract This research aims to investigate what is known as experimental bioethics, examining and denouncing the sometimes unjustifiable shortcomings and simplifications in the corpus of the field. Some themes are described: openness to reality as a philosophical requirement; relevance of data and priority of concreteness; marked epistemological interest; link to cognitive, moral and social psychology; prominence of intuition as a concept and as a function; approach to language, culture and statistics; understanding and development of scientific themes by the working classes; regional and environmental contextual sensitivity; and relevance of experimental thoughts as hypothetical scenarios that encourage discussion. In this study, the main function of reason is considered without discrediting intuition, feelings or emotions, and it is observed that the contradictions, exceptions and divergences typical of experimental philosophy and experimental bioethics should not be interpreted as falsehoods or inconsistencies, since they are part of the methodology and epistemology of experimentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Bioética
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-803420253828en
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental philosophy and experimental bioethics: an estimate

Joaquím Clotet
Revista Bioética
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Experimental philosophy and experimental bioethics: an estimate

Joaquím Clotet
article en

Abstract

Abstract This research aims to investigate what is known as experimental bioethics, examining and denouncing the sometimes unjustifiable shortcomings and simplifications in the corpus of the field. Some themes are described: openness to reality as a philosophical requirement; relevance of data and priority of concreteness; marked epistemological interest; link to cognitive, moral and social psychology; prominence of intuition as a concept and as a function; approach to language, culture and statistics; understanding and development of scientific themes by the working classes; regional and environmental contextual sensitivity; and relevance of experimental thoughts as hypothetical scenarios that encourage discussion. In this study, the main function of reason is considered without discrediting intuition, feelings or emotions, and it is observed that the contradictions, exceptions and divergences typical of experimental philosophy and experimental bioethics should not be interpreted as falsehoods or inconsistencies, since they are part of the methodology and epistemology of experimentation.

Revista BioéticaVol. 33
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Experimental philosophy and experimental bioethics: an estimate — Joaquím Clotet · Revista Bioética (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS