THE PROFILE OF PEER EVALUATOR IN THE ARCU-SUL SYSTEM

Abstract This article outlines and discusses the expected profile of professionals who evaluate undergraduate programs in the International Accreditation System of Mercosul and Associated States, Arcu-Sul. Based on (a) definitions from specialized literature; (b) the principles established by the National Accreditation Agencies of the Mercosul Region; (c) the specific experience of Inep in establishing its Bank of Evaluators (Basis); and (d) the empirical analysis of participants' performance in this international evaluation process for program accreditation, it is inferred that the desired profile for evaluators within the scope of Mercosul´s evaluation cooperation must go beyond the simple requirement of expertise and experience in the area of the evaluated programs. From the Arcu-Sul evaluator, as he is part of an international evaluation process, of a cooperative and supportive nature, of building mutual trust between the countries and agents involved, a significant list of other qualities is also expected, qualities such as familiarity with evaluation processes for the purposes of accreditation and mutual recognition; ability to adapt to different contexts; good communication skills in the official languages of Mercosul; overcoming biases and preconceived nationally oriented judgments; uncompromising commitment to the work agenda defined by the accrediting agencies; full awareness of possible difficulties in logistics related to travel, accommodation and eating habits in the country of the programs under evaluation; academic management experience; ability to carry out teamwork; ethical behavior; commitment to the search for quality, among many other virtues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Avaliação Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas)
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-57652025v30id2925357
Primary Topic
Education and Public Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE PROFILE OF PEER EVALUATOR IN THE ARCU-SUL SYSTEM

Dilvo Ilvo Ristoff, Rogério Dentello
Avaliação Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas)
Education and Public Policy
article

THE PROFILE OF PEER EVALUATOR IN THE ARCU-SUL SYSTEM

Dilvo Ilvo Ristoff, Rogério Dentello
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article outlines and discusses the expected profile of professionals who evaluate undergraduate programs in the International Accreditation System of Mercosul and Associated States, Arcu-Sul. Based on (a) definitions from specialized literature; (b) the principles established by the National Accreditation Agencies of the Mercosul Region; (c) the specific experience of Inep in establishing its Bank of Evaluators (Basis); and (d) the empirical analysis of participants' performance in this international evaluation process for program accreditation, it is inferred that the desired profile for evaluators within the scope of Mercosul´s evaluation cooperation must go beyond the simple requirement of expertise and experience in the area of the evaluated programs. From the Arcu-Sul evaluator, as he is part of an international evaluation process, of a cooperative and supportive nature, of building mutual trust between the countries and agents involved, a significant list of other qualities is also expected, qualities such as familiarity with evaluation processes for the purposes of accreditation and mutual recognition; ability to adapt to different contexts; good communication skills in the official languages of Mercosul; overcoming biases and preconceived nationally oriented judgments; uncompromising commitment to the work agenda defined by the accrediting agencies; full awareness of possible difficulties in logistics related to travel, accommodation and eating habits in the country of the programs under evaluation; academic management experience; ability to carry out teamwork; ethical behavior; commitment to the search for quality, among many other virtues.

Avaliação Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas)Vol. 30
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisa (GW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Education and Public Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THE PROFILE OF PEER EVALUATOR IN THE ARCU-SUL SYSTEM — Dilvo Ilvo Ristoff, Rogério Dentello · Avaliação Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior (Campinas) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS