Evaluation of colorectal surgeons’ approaches to ileal pouch–anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis patients

Abstract Introduction: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the standard of care for elective surgery for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, there are different surgical techniques and several patient variations affecting their outcomes. The aim of this international multicenter study is to assess the approaches of colorectal surgeons toward IPAA procedures. Methods: Thirty colorectal surgeons practicing in Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Oman were asked to complete a questionnaire on their knowledge of indications, complications of IPAA, and practice in selecting stoma versus restorative IPAA for patients with UC. Results: Around 83.3% ( n = 25) of participants were affiliated with academic tertiary hospitals and 66.7% ( n = 20) had an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) multidisciplinary board at their center. Regarding colorectal surgery fellowship, Author 2: 63.3% ( n = 19) of participants were trained abroad (USA, Canada, Korea, Belgium, France, Germany, and UK) and 36.6% ( n = 11) were trained in Saudi Arabia.. Most surgeons performed IPAA independently in their practice (73.3%, n = 22), with an average of 10–20 IBD surgeries per year (50%, n = 15). All the participants agreed that IPAA is indicated in UC patients, while only 5.9% ( n = 1) of participants said that they would perform IPAA for indeterminate colitis. Most of the cohort (70.6%, n = xx) routinely performed two-stage IPAA, while only 29.4% ( n = xx) of participants would routinely perform three-stage IPAA. Conclusion: This survey demonstrates that IPAA is a popular option to improve the quality of life with patients who are required to have surgical treatment. However, there is a need for a multidisciplinary approach to create sustainable outcomes for every patient’s variation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Saudi Surgical Journal
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ssj.ssj_3_25
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of colorectal surgeons’ approaches to ileal pouch–anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis patients

Ghada Enani, Sami Judeeba, Sarah S. Al Ghamdi, Mariam S Mukhtar
Saudi Surgical Journal
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

Evaluation of colorectal surgeons’ approaches to ileal pouch–anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis patients

Ghada Enani, Sami Judeeba, Sarah S. Al Ghamdi, Mariam S Mukhtar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) has become the standard of care for elective surgery for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, there are different surgical techniques and several patient variations affecting their outcomes. The aim of this international multicenter study is to assess the approaches of colorectal surgeons toward IPAA procedures. Methods: Thirty colorectal surgeons practicing in Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Oman were asked to complete a questionnaire on their knowledge of indications, complications of IPAA, and practice in selecting stoma versus restorative IPAA for patients with UC. Results: Around 83.3% ( n = 25) of participants were affiliated with academic tertiary hospitals and 66.7% ( n = 20) had an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) multidisciplinary board at their center. Regarding colorectal surgery fellowship, Author 2: 63.3% ( n = 19) of participants were trained abroad (USA, Canada, Korea, Belgium, France, Germany, and UK) and 36.6% ( n = 11) were trained in Saudi Arabia.. Most surgeons performed IPAA independently in their practice (73.3%, n = 22), with an average of 10–20 IBD surgeries per year (50%, n = 15). All the participants agreed that IPAA is indicated in UC patients, while only 5.9% ( n = 1) of participants said that they would perform IPAA for indeterminate colitis. Most of the cohort (70.6%, n = xx) routinely performed two-stage IPAA, while only 29.4% ( n = xx) of participants would routinely perform three-stage IPAA. Conclusion: This survey demonstrates that IPAA is a popular option to improve the quality of life with patients who are required to have surgical treatment. However, there is a need for a multidisciplinary approach to create sustainable outcomes for every patient’s variation.

Saudi Surgical JournalVol. 13(1)
King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of colorectal surgeons’ approaches to ileal pouch–anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis patients — Ghada Enani, Sami Judeeba, et al. · Saudi Surgical Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS