Revisiting the Case Study Method in Social Research: A Reflective and Argumentative Review for Novice Researchers

This article provides a qualitative review of case study method in social research. The core purpose of this paper is to guide novice researchers in doing case study to explore complex social phenomenon. It begins by clarifying foundational concept of case study and its purpose. It highlights the historical evolution of case study research beginning from Frederic Le Play during 18th century to three key methodologists, Robert K. Yin, Robert E. Stake, and Sharan B. Merriam. It further presents definition, purpose, and philosophical stance of case study from these key philosophers’ perspectives. Based on general qualitative research design it provides detailed exploration of philosophical underpinnings including ontology, epistemology and axiology to guides researcher on making better choice of design and interpretation of case studies. Key features that distinguish case study, like intensive focus on bounded system, holistic exploration, rich description, multiple sources of evidence, and flexibility in design types as defined by Yin and Stake are highlighted. Further, it provides the overview of data collection tools, analysis procedures, and strategical considerations to be followed. Finally, it examines this methodology critically to mention inherent challenges and limitation of case study. This paper integrates theoretical insight with methodological guidance that can serve as the foundational source for early-career researchers. It can be helpful to those researchers who wants to adopt or better understand case study method in social inquiry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Journal
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3126/ej.v3i1.82043
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Case Study Method in Social Research: A Reflective and Argumentative Review for Novice Researchers

Keshab Raj Pokharel, Srijana Paudel, Amrit Marasini
Educational Journal
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

Revisiting the Case Study Method in Social Research: A Reflective and Argumentative Review for Novice Researchers

Keshab Raj Pokharel, Srijana Paudel, Amrit Marasini
article en

Abstract

This article provides a qualitative review of case study method in social research. The core purpose of this paper is to guide novice researchers in doing case study to explore complex social phenomenon. It begins by clarifying foundational concept of case study and its purpose. It highlights the historical evolution of case study research beginning from Frederic Le Play during 18th century to three key methodologists, Robert K. Yin, Robert E. Stake, and Sharan B. Merriam. It further presents definition, purpose, and philosophical stance of case study from these key philosophers’ perspectives. Based on general qualitative research design it provides detailed exploration of philosophical underpinnings including ontology, epistemology and axiology to guides researcher on making better choice of design and interpretation of case studies. Key features that distinguish case study, like intensive focus on bounded system, holistic exploration, rich description, multiple sources of evidence, and flexibility in design types as defined by Yin and Stake are highlighted. Further, it provides the overview of data collection tools, analysis procedures, and strategical considerations to be followed. Finally, it examines this methodology critically to mention inherent challenges and limitation of case study. This paper integrates theoretical insight with methodological guidance that can serve as the foundational source for early-career researchers. It can be helpful to those researchers who wants to adopt or better understand case study method in social inquiry.

Educational JournalVol. 3(1)
Tribhuvan University (NP), Kathmandu University (NP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.