The QuickSee autorefractor reliably measures the accommodative response in children compared with the Shin‐Nippon autorefractor

The agreement observed here demonstrates that the QuickSee shows promise in measuring accommodative response over a range of demands (2, 3 and 4 D) in a paediatric population without significant ametropia. Further research is required to determine if these findings translate over a wider range of refractive errors, and to evaluate the value of QuickSee accommodative response measures in vision screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13557
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The QuickSee autorefractor reliably measures the accommodative response in children compared with the Shin‐Nippon autorefractor

Jane M. Fulton, Julie‐Anne Little, Bruce Moore, Rebecca Leighton et al.
1 links
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

The QuickSee autorefractor reliably measures the accommodative response in children compared with the Shin‐Nippon autorefractor

Jane M. Fulton, Julie‐Anne Little, Bruce Moore, Rebecca Leighton, Tuyishime Didier Fidele Uwacu
article en

Abstract

The agreement observed here demonstrates that the QuickSee shows promise in measuring accommodative response over a range of demands (2, 3 and 4 D) in a paediatric population without significant ametropia. Further research is required to determine if these findings translate over a wider range of refractive errors, and to evaluate the value of QuickSee accommodative response measures in vision screening.

Ophthalmic and Physiological OpticsVol. 45(7)
University of Ulster (GB), New England College of Optometry (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.