Advancing equity in healthcare systems: understanding implicit bias and infant mortality

Using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) and Project Implicit, this study examined whether anti-Black implicit racial biases predict infant mortality for Black Americans. We examined state-level mean Black-White Implicit Association Test (BW-IAT) Bias Scores and controlled for explicit bias scores and White infant mortality rates for over 1.7 million American participants across ten different ethnoracial groups between 2018-2020. Hierarchical linear regressions determined state-level anti-Black implicit bias significantly predicted state-level Black infant mortality rates, above and beyond explicit bias and White infant mortality, in 2018 (b = .32, t(34) = 2.09, p < .05), 2019 (b = .30, t(34) = 2.09, p < .05), and 2020 (b = .32, t(34) = 2.18, p < .05). State-level anti-Black implicit bias also explained a significant proportion of variance in state-level infant mortality rates, in 2018 (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.30, F(3, 35) = 4.89, p < 0.01), 2019 (R<sup>2</sup> = .33, F(3, 36) = 5.95, p < .01), and 2020 (R<sup>2</sup> = .39, F(3, 35) = 7.58, p < .001). Also, among healthcare professionals, there are similar levels of implicit biases compared to the general American population. Findings suggest that implicit racial bias is a risk factor for Black infant mortality. These findings also point to the ethical challenge implicit biases pose to equitable decision-making and patient-provider relationships in healthcare. By integrating these insights into interdisciplinary discussions, this study provides supporting data for systemic reforms and anti-bias training to create a healthcare system grounded in fairness and equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01228-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing equity in healthcare systems: understanding implicit bias and infant mortality

M. Myriah MacIntyre, Sophia Gran-Ruaz, S. Mistry, Dana Strauss et al.
1 citations
BMC Medical Ethics
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
4.20
article

Advancing equity in healthcare systems: understanding implicit bias and infant mortality

M. Myriah MacIntyre, Sophia Gran-Ruaz, S. Mistry, Dana Strauss, Sonya C. Faber, Monnica T. Williams
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) and Project Implicit, this study examined whether anti-Black implicit racial biases predict infant mortality for Black Americans. We examined state-level mean Black-White Implicit Association Test (BW-IAT) Bias Scores and controlled for explicit bias scores and White infant mortality rates for over 1.7 million American participants across ten different ethnoracial groups between 2018-2020. Hierarchical linear regressions determined state-level anti-Black implicit bias significantly predicted state-level Black infant mortality rates, above and beyond explicit bias and White infant mortality, in 2018 (b = .32, t(34) = 2.09, p < .05), 2019 (b = .30, t(34) = 2.09, p < .05), and 2020 (b = .32, t(34) = 2.18, p < .05). State-level anti-Black implicit bias also explained a significant proportion of variance in state-level infant mortality rates, in 2018 (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.30, F(3, 35) = 4.89, p < 0.01), 2019 (R<sup>2</sup> = .33, F(3, 36) = 5.95, p < .01), and 2020 (R<sup>2</sup> = .39, F(3, 35) = 7.58, p < .001). Also, among healthcare professionals, there are similar levels of implicit biases compared to the general American population. Findings suggest that implicit racial bias is a risk factor for Black infant mortality. These findings also point to the ethical challenge implicit biases pose to equitable decision-making and patient-provider relationships in healthcare. By integrating these insights into interdisciplinary discussions, this study provides supporting data for systemic reforms and anti-bias training to create a healthcare system grounded in fairness and equity.

BMC Medical EthicsVol. 26(1)
University of Ottawa (CA), Ottawa University (US)
Canada Research Chairs
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.