Effectiveness of HAPA-based oral hygiene instruction in patients over 65 years of age: a randomized controlled trial

The aim of the study was to provide oral hygiene instructions tailored to behavioral stages based on the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) and to assess their impact on oral health compared with standardized instructions in patients aged 65 and older. A total of 67 university clinic patients were randomly assigned to an intervention (n = 33) and a control group (n = 34) and 62 patients, aged 65 to 87 years (M = 71.3, SD = 5.3), participated in both the baseline and the follow-up visit. To assess oral hygiene, the parameters Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) and Plaque Control Record (PCR) were recorded at baseline and 12 weeks after instruction. In the intervention group, a questionnaire was used at the beginning of both visits to survey oral hygiene behavior and motivation to change behavior. For both groups, the first visit included a survey on oral hygiene parameters followed by either HAPA-based or standard instruction with demonstration of oral hygiene aids. Analyses of covariance with baseline control revealed no difference in GBI between the intervention and control group at the 12-week follow-up. Both the intervention group, t(29) = 3.91, p <.001, d = 0.71, as well as the control group, t(31) = 3.67, p <.001, d = 0.65, demonstrated significant improvement in GBI. In contrast, only the intervention group showed a significant improvement in PCR at reevaluation, t(29) = 2.29, p =.03, d = 0.42. Additionally, the intervention group reported a significant increase in motivation and the frequency of interdental care, t(29), 6.67, p <.001, d = 1.22. This study provides first evidence on the HAPA model being effectively applicable in the context of dental prophylaxis among university clinic patients older than the age of 65. A positive effect on patients’ behavior and oral hygiene could be demonstrated. While general instruction proved effective in reducing gingival bleeding, the theory-based HAPA intervention offered specific advantages in motivation, interdental care, and plaque buildup. German Study Register of Clinical Studies (DRKS, ID DRKS00030040, German Clinical Trials Register, Date of registration 22.03.2023).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06615-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of HAPA-based oral hygiene instruction in patients over 65 years of age: a randomized controlled trial

Verena Klusmann, Stefan Rüttermann, Susanne Gerhardt‐Szép, Linn Baumann et al.
1 citations
BMC Oral Health
Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
2.52
article

Effectiveness of HAPA-based oral hygiene instruction in patients over 65 years of age: a randomized controlled trial

Verena Klusmann, Stefan Rüttermann, Susanne Gerhardt‐Szép, Linn Baumann, Charlène Bamberg
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The aim of the study was to provide oral hygiene instructions tailored to behavioral stages based on the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) and to assess their impact on oral health compared with standardized instructions in patients aged 65 and older. A total of 67 university clinic patients were randomly assigned to an intervention (n = 33) and a control group (n = 34) and 62 patients, aged 65 to 87 years (M = 71.3, SD = 5.3), participated in both the baseline and the follow-up visit. To assess oral hygiene, the parameters Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) and Plaque Control Record (PCR) were recorded at baseline and 12 weeks after instruction. In the intervention group, a questionnaire was used at the beginning of both visits to survey oral hygiene behavior and motivation to change behavior. For both groups, the first visit included a survey on oral hygiene parameters followed by either HAPA-based or standard instruction with demonstration of oral hygiene aids. Analyses of covariance with baseline control revealed no difference in GBI between the intervention and control group at the 12-week follow-up. Both the intervention group, t(29) = 3.91, p <.001, d = 0.71, as well as the control group, t(31) = 3.67, p <.001, d = 0.65, demonstrated significant improvement in GBI. In contrast, only the intervention group showed a significant improvement in PCR at reevaluation, t(29) = 2.29, p =.03, d = 0.42. Additionally, the intervention group reported a significant increase in motivation and the frequency of interdental care, t(29), 6.67, p <.001, d = 1.22. This study provides first evidence on the HAPA model being effectively applicable in the context of dental prophylaxis among university clinic patients older than the age of 65. A positive effect on patients’ behavior and oral hygiene could be demonstrated. While general instruction proved effective in reducing gingival bleeding, the theory-based HAPA intervention offered specific advantages in motivation, interdental care, and plaque buildup. German Study Register of Clinical Studies (DRKS, ID DRKS00030040, German Clinical Trials Register, Date of registration 22.03.2023).

BMC Oral HealthVol. 25(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), University of Konstanz (DE), Furtwangen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
2.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.