Ethics support personnel’s perceptions of patient and parent participation in clinical ethics support services in pediatric oncology

Despite seeing positive reasons for PPP in CESS, the ethics support personnel were mainly concerned about the potential participant harm and wanted to protect the child and the parent. This could be interpreted as a form of disguised paternalism. The perceived appropriateness of PPP in CESS in pediatric oncology seems to depend on the situation. Furthermore, in cases where it can be considered, there is no universal way of doing it. An important enabler may be to customize PPP in CESS on a case-by-case basis and to apply the identified strategies to reduce potential risk of causing harm. This study contributes to increased knowledge about PPP in CESS from the perspectives of ethics support personnel in pediatric oncology and informs us about what is needed to carefully foster PPP in CESS, both practically and morally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01267-5
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethics support personnel’s perceptions of patient and parent participation in clinical ethics support services in pediatric oncology

Isabelle Billstein, Cecilia Bartholdson, Pernilla Pergert, Bert Molewijk et al.
3 citations
BMC Medical Ethics
Ethics in medical practice
8.45
article

Ethics support personnel’s perceptions of patient and parent participation in clinical ethics support services in pediatric oncology

Isabelle Billstein, Cecilia Bartholdson, Pernilla Pergert, Bert Molewijk, Anders Castor
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Despite seeing positive reasons for PPP in CESS, the ethics support personnel were mainly concerned about the potential participant harm and wanted to protect the child and the parent. This could be interpreted as a form of disguised paternalism. The perceived appropriateness of PPP in CESS in pediatric oncology seems to depend on the situation. Furthermore, in cases where it can be considered, there is no universal way of doing it. An important enabler may be to customize PPP in CESS on a case-by-case basis and to apply the identified strategies to reduce potential risk of causing harm. This study contributes to increased knowledge about PPP in CESS from the perspectives of ethics support personnel in pediatric oncology and informs us about what is needed to carefully foster PPP in CESS, both practically and morally.

BMC Medical EthicsVol. 26(1)
Uppsala University (SE), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Skåne University Hospital (SE), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Karolinska Institutet
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ethics in medical practice
8.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.