Ethics support personnel’s perceptions of patient and parent participation in clinical ethics support services in pediatric oncology
Despite seeing positive reasons for PPP in CESS, the ethics support personnel were mainly concerned about the potential participant harm and wanted to protect the child and the parent. This could be interpreted as a form of disguised paternalism. The perceived appropriateness of PPP in CESS in pediatric oncology seems to depend on the situation. Furthermore, in cases where it can be considered, there is no universal way of doing it. An important enabler may be to customize PPP in CESS on a case-by-case basis and to apply the identified strategies to reduce potential risk of causing harm. This study contributes to increased knowledge about PPP in CESS from the perspectives of ethics support personnel in pediatric oncology and informs us about what is needed to carefully foster PPP in CESS, both practically and morally.
Authors
- Isabelle Billstein
- Cecilia Bartholdson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5807-3438)
- Pernilla Pergert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4210-855X)
- Bert Molewijk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1944-9759)
- Anders Castor
Institutions
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Skåne University Hospital (SE)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Medical Ethics
- Published
- 2025-07-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01267-5
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Ethics in medical practice
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.45
Funders
- Karolinska Institutet