Error Monitoring Failure in Metamemory Appraisal: A Visuospatial-Driven Feature of Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer’s Disease

ObjectiveAnosognosia for memory deficits is frequently observed in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Despite its relevance, this phenomenon is understudied in individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). People with MCI often struggle to update self-referential beliefs about memory functioning. Nonetheless, findings on error monitoring capacity are mixed and methodologically weak, especially in visuospatial tasks. Here, we investigated online metamemory appraisal for verbal and visuospatial material in patients with MCI due to AD. The potential diagnostic utility of metamemory accuracy was evaluated.MethodsSixteen patients with MCI and 19 healthy controls completed metamemory tasks involving predictions on list and position memory performance. Metamemory accuracy was quantified using the Objective Judgment Discrepancy (OJD) index, the percentage difference between predicted and actual performance. Linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze main effects and interactions.ResultsCompared to controls, patients overestimated their memory performance (<i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.51), with greater overestimation in the visuospatial task (<i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.57). After adjusting for cognitive functioning, only overestimation in visuospatial memory persisted. Visuospatial OJD correlated significantly with executive and visuospatial abilities (all <i>r</i>ho ≥ -0.50, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Clinimetric analyses highlighted visuospatial OJD as a promising marker for diagnostic use (AUC = 0.814, <i>P</i> < 0.001, sensitivity = 0.67, specificity = 0.95).ConclusionOverestimation in verbal memory reflects a statistical artifact consistent with the Dunning-Kruger effect. A selective metacognitive deficit was found in visuospatial memory. Our results support the view of AD as a visuospatial-driven disease and underscore the diagnostic potential of visuospatial metamemory assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251362470
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cognitive Functions and Memory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Error Monitoring Failure in Metamemory Appraisal: A Visuospatial-Driven Feature of Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer’s Disease

Ciro Rosario Ilardi, Alessandro Iavarone, Gabriella Santangelo, Paola Marangolo et al.
3 citations
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
Cognitive Functions and Memory
6.35
article

Error Monitoring Failure in Metamemory Appraisal: A Visuospatial-Driven Feature of Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer’s Disease

Ciro Rosario Ilardi, Alessandro Iavarone, Gabriella Santangelo, Paola Marangolo, Sergio Chieffi, Giovanni Federico, Mario Napoletano, Alessandra Finoja
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveAnosognosia for memory deficits is frequently observed in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Despite its relevance, this phenomenon is understudied in individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). People with MCI often struggle to update self-referential beliefs about memory functioning. Nonetheless, findings on error monitoring capacity are mixed and methodologically weak, especially in visuospatial tasks. Here, we investigated online metamemory appraisal for verbal and visuospatial material in patients with MCI due to AD. The potential diagnostic utility of metamemory accuracy was evaluated.MethodsSixteen patients with MCI and 19 healthy controls completed metamemory tasks involving predictions on list and position memory performance. Metamemory accuracy was quantified using the Objective Judgment Discrepancy (OJD) index, the percentage difference between predicted and actual performance. Linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze main effects and interactions.ResultsCompared to controls, patients overestimated their memory performance (<i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.51), with greater overestimation in the visuospatial task (<i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.57). After adjusting for cognitive functioning, only overestimation in visuospatial memory persisted. Visuospatial OJD correlated significantly with executive and visuospatial abilities (all <i>r</i>ho ≥ -0.50, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Clinimetric analyses highlighted visuospatial OJD as a promising marker for diagnostic use (AUC = 0.814, <i>P</i> < 0.001, sensitivity = 0.67, specificity = 0.95).ConclusionOverestimation in verbal memory reflects a statistical artifact consistent with the Dunning-Kruger effect. A selective metacognitive deficit was found in visuospatial memory. Our results support the view of AD as a visuospatial-driven disease and underscore the diagnostic potential of visuospatial metamemory assessments.

Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and NeurologyVol. 39(3)
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT), Università degli Studi Suor Orsola Benincasa (IT), CTO Hospital (IT), Federico II University Hospital (IT), Hitachi (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cognitive Functions and Memory
6.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.