Unequal attention allocation during multiple object tracking: Evidence from an eye-tracking study

In many situations, such as driving and playing team sports, we are required to allocate our attention unevenly across multiple moving targets that have different levels of relevance or importance (priority) to us. While previous studies have demonstrated an apparent ability to allocate attention in an uneven way to objects/regions in multiple object tracking (MOT), how such differential prioritisation comes about is still an open question. In this study, we investigated the role of eye movements in an MOT task where two targets varied in their likelihood of being queried for a motion direction estimate. As the priority of a target increased, participants fixated on or near the object more frequently and longer, and their direction estimates were more accurate. We explored the role of different tracking strategies (centroid vs. target-switching), investigating how these are differentially employed depending on target priority. Our findings support the flexible deployment of attention in a graded manner and demonstrate that differential prioritisation primarily involves differential looking between targets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251362833
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unequal attention allocation during multiple object tracking: Evidence from an eye-tracking study

Christopher Kent, Veronica Hadjipanayi, Casimir J. H. Ludwig, Dylan Zhu-Dong
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
article

Unequal attention allocation during multiple object tracking: Evidence from an eye-tracking study

Christopher Kent, Veronica Hadjipanayi, Casimir J. H. Ludwig, Dylan Zhu-Dong
article en

Abstract

In many situations, such as driving and playing team sports, we are required to allocate our attention unevenly across multiple moving targets that have different levels of relevance or importance (priority) to us. While previous studies have demonstrated an apparent ability to allocate attention in an uneven way to objects/regions in multiple object tracking (MOT), how such differential prioritisation comes about is still an open question. In this study, we investigated the role of eye movements in an MOT task where two targets varied in their likelihood of being queried for a motion direction estimate. As the priority of a target increased, participants fixated on or near the object more frequently and longer, and their direction estimates were more accurate. We explored the role of different tracking strategies (centroid vs. target-switching), investigating how these are differentially employed depending on target priority. Our findings support the flexible deployment of attention in a graded manner and demonstrate that differential prioritisation primarily involves differential looking between targets.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental PsychologyVol. 79(3)
University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unequal attention allocation during multiple object tracking: Evidence from an eye-tracking study — Christopher Kent, Veronica Hadjipanayi, et al. · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS