Characterizing inquiry-based science classroom learning environments—generative or replicative—using teachers’ epistemic orientations: a qualitative study

This study examines the relationship and influences between teacher epistemic beliefs and their learning environment. Drawing on a multiple case study design, six in-service elementary school science teachers were purposefully selected from a larger, NSF-funded study of teachers’ adaptive expertise in the epistemic complexities of science teaching. Methods involved hypothesis, open, and integrative cross-case & cross-strata analyses of epistemic orientation surveys, field observation notes, semi-structured interviews, vignettes, and Teacher Implementation scores, demonstrate that teacher beliefs/orientation type are associated with classroom environment type characterization. Further, results show that struggles of teachers mirrored elementary school science teachers’ sense of control , persistence , and adaptive expertise . Major findings from the study reveal that participants who exhibited rigid epistemic beliefs and fluid/flexible epistemic beliefs tended to establish replicative and generative learning environments respectively, albeit on a continuum. And that, while teachers with flexible epistemic belief showed increased teacher adaptive expertise and co-shared classroom authority/control , teachers with rigid epistemic belief struggled to release control and were generally less adaptive/persistent. Finally, the study discusses pertinent implications for policy, practice, and research. For policy, framers of standards documents, policy makers of teacher preparation, and curriculum developers should consider teacher beliefs and attitudes as foundational for framing future science standards. Regarding practice, the study suggests a reconstruction of belief systems about knowledge and knowing or a total shift in epistemic beliefs for practice. Future research could explore the synergy of all the data sets by adopting a multi-perspective approach for their study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1508207
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing inquiry-based science classroom learning environments—generative or replicative—using teachers’ epistemic orientations: a qualitative study

Gavin W. Fulmer, Brian Hand, Grant E. Gardner, Jee Suh et al.
1 links
Frontiers in Education
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Characterizing inquiry-based science classroom learning environments—generative or replicative—using teachers’ epistemic orientations: a qualitative study

Gavin W. Fulmer, Brian Hand, Grant E. Gardner, Jee Suh, Eric Antwi Akuoko
article en

Abstract

This study examines the relationship and influences between teacher epistemic beliefs and their learning environment. Drawing on a multiple case study design, six in-service elementary school science teachers were purposefully selected from a larger, NSF-funded study of teachers’ adaptive expertise in the epistemic complexities of science teaching. Methods involved hypothesis, open, and integrative cross-case & cross-strata analyses of epistemic orientation surveys, field observation notes, semi-structured interviews, vignettes, and Teacher Implementation scores, demonstrate that teacher beliefs/orientation type are associated with classroom environment type characterization. Further, results show that struggles of teachers mirrored elementary school science teachers’ sense of control , persistence , and adaptive expertise . Major findings from the study reveal that participants who exhibited rigid epistemic beliefs and fluid/flexible epistemic beliefs tended to establish replicative and generative learning environments respectively, albeit on a continuum. And that, while teachers with flexible epistemic belief showed increased teacher adaptive expertise and co-shared classroom authority/control , teachers with rigid epistemic belief struggled to release control and were generally less adaptive/persistent. Finally, the study discusses pertinent implications for policy, practice, and research. For policy, framers of standards documents, policy makers of teacher preparation, and curriculum developers should consider teacher beliefs and attitudes as foundational for framing future science standards. Regarding practice, the study suggests a reconstruction of belief systems about knowledge and knowing or a total shift in epistemic beliefs for practice. Future research could explore the synergy of all the data sets by adopting a multi-perspective approach for their study.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
University of Iowa (US), St. John's University (US), Middle Tennessee State University (US), University of Alabama (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.