Enamel Hardness in Fluorosed and Nonfluorosed Teeth – An Original Research

Abstract Background: Hardness, which reduces the spread of disease in various periodontal structures, is dependent on various factors. It has been reported that fluorosis tends to bring a change in the hardness but lacks information. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the Vickers hardness of periodontally healthy fluorotic and nonfluorotic enamel. Materials and Methods: Fifteen fluorotic and nonfluorotic enamel specimens were mounted in Plaster of Paris in PVC rings. They were subjected to a load of 25 g for 20 s in occlusal, middle, and cervical thirds using a Zwick/ZHV Vickers hardness tester with a square-based indenter at 136° angle. Results: In fluorotic enamel specimens, no significant difference was observed between the occlusal and middle zones within the groups and between the groups. The total Vickers hardness number of the fluorotic enamel had significantly higher values (346.45±52.89) than nonfluorotic enamel (322.60±46.23). Conclusion: Within the limits of the study, fluorosis tends to increase the hardness of enamel.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Medical and Oral Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmo.ijmo_4_25
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enamel Hardness in Fluorosed and Nonfluorosed Teeth – An Original Research

Prasad Sakthidharan Aswin, Vangara Aditya, Kharidhi Laxman Vandana, Kumar Reddy Sanjeeva et al.
1 links
International Journal of Medical and Oral Research
Dental materials and restorations
article

Enamel Hardness in Fluorosed and Nonfluorosed Teeth – An Original Research

Prasad Sakthidharan Aswin, Vangara Aditya, Kharidhi Laxman Vandana, Kumar Reddy Sanjeeva, Lakhani Nazam
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Hardness, which reduces the spread of disease in various periodontal structures, is dependent on various factors. It has been reported that fluorosis tends to bring a change in the hardness but lacks information. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the Vickers hardness of periodontally healthy fluorotic and nonfluorotic enamel. Materials and Methods: Fifteen fluorotic and nonfluorotic enamel specimens were mounted in Plaster of Paris in PVC rings. They were subjected to a load of 25 g for 20 s in occlusal, middle, and cervical thirds using a Zwick/ZHV Vickers hardness tester with a square-based indenter at 136° angle. Results: In fluorotic enamel specimens, no significant difference was observed between the occlusal and middle zones within the groups and between the groups. The total Vickers hardness number of the fluorotic enamel had significantly higher values (346.45±52.89) than nonfluorotic enamel (322.60±46.23). Conclusion: Within the limits of the study, fluorosis tends to increase the hardness of enamel.

International Journal of Medical and Oral ResearchVol. 10(1)
Italian Society of Periodontology and Implantology (IT), Bapuji Dental College and Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.