Current Antithrombotic Prescribing Habits for Extended Secondary Prevention in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease and Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism: A Survey Among Specialists in Angiology and Vascular Surgery

<b>Background:</b> Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is conventionally treated with anticoagulant therapy. In contrast, the core treatment for peripheral artery disease (PAD) is antiplatelet therapy. VTE and PAD share common risk factors and may occur in the same patient. Nonetheless, there is little evidence of the best antithrombotic regimen to use when the two conditions coexist, especially in terms of the extended prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major adverse limb events (MALE), and VTE recurrences. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted an online survey of members of the Italian Society of Angiology and Vascular Medicine (SIAPAV) to explore current prescribing habits for extended antithrombotic therapy in patients with PAD and unprovoked VTE. The survey included four clinical scenarios with variations in age, gender, bleeding risk, index VTE event, and severity of PAD. In all cases, patients had received anticoagulation for 6 months, and the key question was how to continue treatment beyond 6 months from the index VTE event. <b>Results:</b> A total of 174 clinicians participated to the survey. The most common choice was combining antiplatelet therapy with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) at a low dose. Full-dose DOAC alone or antiplatelet therapy alone were less frequently chosen. Older age and high bleeding risk increased the preference for antiplatelet therapy alone. <b>Conclusions:</b> This survey highlights the marked variability in antithrombotic prescribing patterns among specialists in vascular medicine for patients with unprovoked VTE and concomitant PAD, reflecting the lack of evidence on optimal management in this specific setting. More research is needed to define the safest and most effective treatment strategies for patients with concurrent PAD and VTE.