University students' scientific knowledge levels regarding chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows

This study investigated undergraduate students? recognition of chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows and their understanding of their functions. The research was conducted using a comparative research design. A four- -tier diagnostic test for chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows was developed. 181 university students participated in the test development phase. The difficulty and discrimination indices of the test items were calculated. The reliability coefficient of the test was found to be 0.76. The four-tier diagnostic test was then administered to 174 university students to determine whether the participants? levels of scientific knowledge of chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows differed by gender, department and grade levels. The results showed that the university students had an inadequate level of scientific knowledge about chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows. It was found that more than half of the university students were deficient in all questions. It was also found that the level of scientific knowledge of the participants did not differ according to gender, but did differ according to grade level and department. These differences were in favour of fourth year students and against electrical and electronics engineering students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2298/jsc240523053o
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

University students' scientific knowledge levels regarding chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows

Cemal Tosun, Gökçe Özveren, Betül Turan, Melike Ulucan
Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

University students' scientific knowledge levels regarding chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows

Cemal Tosun, Gökçe Özveren, Betül Turan, Melike Ulucan
article en

Abstract

This study investigated undergraduate students? recognition of chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows and their understanding of their functions. The research was conducted using a comparative research design. A four- -tier diagnostic test for chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows was developed. 181 university students participated in the test development phase. The difficulty and discrimination indices of the test items were calculated. The reliability coefficient of the test was found to be 0.76. The four-tier diagnostic test was then administered to 174 university students to determine whether the participants? levels of scientific knowledge of chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows differed by gender, department and grade levels. The results showed that the university students had an inadequate level of scientific knowledge about chemical reaction arrows and electron arrows. It was found that more than half of the university students were deficient in all questions. It was also found that the level of scientific knowledge of the participants did not differ according to gender, but did differ according to grade level and department. These differences were in favour of fourth year students and against electrical and electronics engineering students.

Journal of the Serbian Chemical SocietyVol. 90(10)
Bartin University (TR), Korean Council for University Education (KR)
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.