Not-so-Failing Junior PartnerRe-examining the AEF's Chemical Warfare Experience before and during the German Spring Offensives

This study, using the revisionist critique of the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF), reopens the issue of US involvement in the ever-engaging field of World War I chemical warfare. It disputes revisionist claims of a lack of US preparedness and insufficient frontline effectiveness, through the concepts of effectiveness and efficiency. After examining the organisation and the decisions concerning research, production and protection from new CW agents, it discusses the four AEF combat episodes on the Western Front during the German spring 1918 offensives. While revisionist critique has a strong rationale, it needs to be examined on a case-by-case basis using often untapped archival sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
War in History
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09683445251357397
Primary Topic
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not-so-Failing Junior PartnerRe-examining the AEF's Chemical Warfare Experience before and during the German Spring Offensives

Vít Klepárník
War in History
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
article

Not-so-Failing Junior PartnerRe-examining the AEF's Chemical Warfare Experience before and during the German Spring Offensives

Vít Klepárník
article en

Abstract

This study, using the revisionist critique of the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF), reopens the issue of US involvement in the ever-engaging field of World War I chemical warfare. It disputes revisionist claims of a lack of US preparedness and insufficient frontline effectiveness, through the concepts of effectiveness and efficiency. After examining the organisation and the decisions concerning research, production and protection from new CW agents, it discusses the four AEF combat episodes on the Western Front during the German spring 1918 offensives. While revisionist critique has a strong rationale, it needs to be examined on a case-by-case basis using often untapped archival sources.

War in History
Charles University (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.