A response to ‘societal polarization, academic freedom, and the promise of dialogical sociology’
In this response to Sari Hanafi’s article on societal polarisation and academic freedom’, I critically examine three key conceptual claims he makes. The first relates to the claim that globally, we are witnessing societal polarisation. Secondly, this polarisation arises as a consequence of the political Left/Right binary, and that thirdly this binary leads to reduced levels of academic freedom. In contrast, I argue that it is not evident that society is more polarised in contemporary times than previously, that the narrative of a political Left/Right binary is overstated and misleading, and thirdly, I question the methodology that claims empirical evidence of declining levels of academic freedom.
Authors
- Dina Kiwan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2591-0388)
Institutions
- University of Birmingham (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Dialogues in sociology.
- Published
- 2025-07-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/29768667251358646
- Primary Topic
- Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00