Observational Insights of Solar-Terrestrial Coupling from the Ionospheric and Surface Impacts during Solar Perturbations

We investigated three intense solar–terrestrial disturbance chains in 2022 viz. an X1.5 flare on February 15, an X1.0 + M8.7 flare based CME sequence on October 2 and a G3-geomagnetic storm driven by multiple CMEs on October 4 thereby aiming to diagnose how impulsive solar energy input cascades through the coupled ionosphere and troposphere system. Multi-platform data sets were used: GOES/SDO EUV–X-ray fluxes, ESA Solar Orbiter imagery, SWPC solar-wind and IMF parameters, ground-based ionosondes (TEC, NmF2, Ne, f0F2) and surface meteorological records. Results reveal a spectrum of responses governed by event type and magnetic field geometry. Immediate ionospheric impacts show a TEC bulge within < 5 min and peak NmF2/f0F2 at 16:00 UT. These were exclusive to the Earth-pointing X1.0 flare on October 2, neither the backside X1.5 flare nor the geomagnetic storm responsible for the production of such daytime surges. Ring current and TEC coupling was strongest on October 2. Bz minima (-8 nT) coincided with a 588 km s⁻¹ solar-wind stream, yielding the highest polynomial 0th and 1 st coefficients in TEC-Dst hysteresis loops. Storm scale forcing on October 4 manifested as sustained Kp = 7 and deep polar-cap absorption though the correlation of flare flux with Kp as low. Joule heating driven gravity-wave packets elevated high latitude surface pressure by 2–3 hPa and enlarged standard deviations of TEC and NmF2. Back-side eruptions on February 15 generated a negligible tropospheric or ionospheric change despite of a 3 Mkm prominence; SUVI-STEREO imagery confirmed the eruption’s off-disk trajectory thereby highlighting geo-effective line-of-sight requirements. Surface meteorology echoed upper-atmosphere forcing as the X1.05 flare embedded in the October 2 sequence cooled near-surface air and dew point while raising humidity and pressure, consistent with rapid modulation of the global atmospheric-electric circuit. Collectively, the study demonstrates that only Earth directed, magnetically connected sources drive coherent, multi-layer perturbations. Event specific lag signatures as in minutes for flare ionization, in hours for CME ion-drag heating and days for storm time gravity-wave coupling so these are critical to forecasting technology relevant ionospheric gradients and extreme weather precursors

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.73196
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Observational Insights of Solar-Terrestrial Coupling from the Ionospheric and Surface Impacts during Solar Perturbations

Abhijit Banerjee
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Astro and Planetary Science
article

Observational Insights of Solar-Terrestrial Coupling from the Ionospheric and Surface Impacts during Solar Perturbations

Abhijit Banerjee
article en

Abstract

We investigated three intense solar–terrestrial disturbance chains in 2022 viz. an X1.5 flare on February 15, an X1.0 + M8.7 flare based CME sequence on October 2 and a G3-geomagnetic storm driven by multiple CMEs on October 4 thereby aiming to diagnose how impulsive solar energy input cascades through the coupled ionosphere and troposphere system. Multi-platform data sets were used: GOES/SDO EUV–X-ray fluxes, ESA Solar Orbiter imagery, SWPC solar-wind and IMF parameters, ground-based ionosondes (TEC, NmF2, Ne, f0F2) and surface meteorological records. Results reveal a spectrum of responses governed by event type and magnetic field geometry. Immediate ionospheric impacts show a TEC bulge within < 5 min and peak NmF2/f0F2 at 16:00 UT. These were exclusive to the Earth-pointing X1.0 flare on October 2, neither the backside X1.5 flare nor the geomagnetic storm responsible for the production of such daytime surges. Ring current and TEC coupling was strongest on October 2. Bz minima (-8 nT) coincided with a 588 km s⁻¹ solar-wind stream, yielding the highest polynomial 0th and 1 st coefficients in TEC-Dst hysteresis loops. Storm scale forcing on October 4 manifested as sustained Kp = 7 and deep polar-cap absorption though the correlation of flare flux with Kp as low. Joule heating driven gravity-wave packets elevated high latitude surface pressure by 2–3 hPa and enlarged standard deviations of TEC and NmF2. Back-side eruptions on February 15 generated a negligible tropospheric or ionospheric change despite of a 3 Mkm prominence; SUVI-STEREO imagery confirmed the eruption’s off-disk trajectory thereby highlighting geo-effective line-of-sight requirements. Surface meteorology echoed upper-atmosphere forcing as the X1.05 flare embedded in the October 2 sequence cooled near-surface air and dew point while raising humidity and pressure, consistent with rapid modulation of the global atmospheric-electric circuit. Collectively, the study demonstrates that only Earth directed, magnetically connected sources drive coherent, multi-layer perturbations. Event specific lag signatures as in minutes for flare ionization, in hours for CME ion-drag heating and days for storm time gravity-wave coupling so these are critical to forecasting technology relevant ionospheric gradients and extreme weather precursors

International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering TechnologyVol. 13(7)
University of Calcutta (IN)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Astro and Planetary Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.