Comparison of Lower Limb Kinematics Between Increased Hip Flexion Gait and Cycling: Implications for Exercise Prescription in Clinical Populations

Exercise is an important component in the treatment and improvement of function in populations with or at risk of lower limb injury. Cycling is the most common exercise modality used by these populations. However, reduced lower limb joint excursion and/or range of motion (ROM) during cycling might limit the optimization of functional improvements. Increased hip flexion gait (HFgait) is a new exercise modality that might result in larger lower limb joint excursions compared to cycling. The purpose of this study was to compare lower limb kinematics between HFgait and cycling. Twelve healthy individuals participated in the study. Each participant performed cycling and HFgait. Hip, knee, and ankle kinematics in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes were analyzed with and without phase offset reduction (POR). Discrete and continuous analyses were performed. Discrete analysis indicated differences for at least one of the variables analyzed (maximum, minimum, and ROM) for the hip (p ≤ 0.041), knee (p ≤ 0.008), and ankle (p ≤ 0.040) across all planes. For the continuous analysis, differences between HFgait and cycling kinematics were observed during the cycles for the hip, knee, and ankle sagittal (hip: original: 85%; with POR: 77%; knee: original: 93%; with POR: 76%; ankle: original: 14%; with POR: 14%), frontal (hip: original: 93%; with POR: 98%; knee: original: 41%; with POR: 12%; ankle: original: 4%; with POR: 5%), and transverse (hip: original: 66%; with POR: 0%; knee: original: 14%; with POR: 0%; ankle: original: 3%; with POR: 0%) planes. HFgait resulted in larger hip (+60.2°) and knee (+38.2°) sagittal plane ROM while maintaining the hip in a more neutral position in the frontal plane compared with cycling. These findings can support the development of rehabilitation strategies with the goal of improving function and joint range of motion while also receiving the health benefits of exercise.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-07-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148045
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Lower Limb Kinematics Between Increased Hip Flexion Gait and Cycling: Implications for Exercise Prescription in Clinical Populations

Tanner Thorsen, Nuno Oliveira
Applied Sciences
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

Comparison of Lower Limb Kinematics Between Increased Hip Flexion Gait and Cycling: Implications for Exercise Prescription in Clinical Populations

Tanner Thorsen, Nuno Oliveira
article en

Abstract

Exercise is an important component in the treatment and improvement of function in populations with or at risk of lower limb injury. Cycling is the most common exercise modality used by these populations. However, reduced lower limb joint excursion and/or range of motion (ROM) during cycling might limit the optimization of functional improvements. Increased hip flexion gait (HFgait) is a new exercise modality that might result in larger lower limb joint excursions compared to cycling. The purpose of this study was to compare lower limb kinematics between HFgait and cycling. Twelve healthy individuals participated in the study. Each participant performed cycling and HFgait. Hip, knee, and ankle kinematics in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes were analyzed with and without phase offset reduction (POR). Discrete and continuous analyses were performed. Discrete analysis indicated differences for at least one of the variables analyzed (maximum, minimum, and ROM) for the hip (p ≤ 0.041), knee (p ≤ 0.008), and ankle (p ≤ 0.040) across all planes. For the continuous analysis, differences between HFgait and cycling kinematics were observed during the cycles for the hip, knee, and ankle sagittal (hip: original: 85%; with POR: 77%; knee: original: 93%; with POR: 76%; ankle: original: 14%; with POR: 14%), frontal (hip: original: 93%; with POR: 98%; knee: original: 41%; with POR: 12%; ankle: original: 4%; with POR: 5%), and transverse (hip: original: 66%; with POR: 0%; knee: original: 14%; with POR: 0%; ankle: original: 3%; with POR: 0%) planes. HFgait resulted in larger hip (+60.2°) and knee (+38.2°) sagittal plane ROM while maintaining the hip in a more neutral position in the frontal plane compared with cycling. These findings can support the development of rehabilitation strategies with the goal of improving function and joint range of motion while also receiving the health benefits of exercise.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(14)
University of Southern Mississippi (US)
American Heart Association
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.