The Agency Costs of Side‐by‐side Management: Evidence from the Hedge Fund and Private Equity Industry

Abstract This paper examines the impact of the simultaneous management of private equity on hedge fund performance. We derive theoretical predictions based on bounded rationality theory and agency theory. We first examine the firm characteristics driving the side‐by‐side decision. We show that the ‘side‐by‐side’ managed hedge funds underperform their peers. The underperformance is more pronounced when the side‐by‐side managed funds have different styles, when they perform worse in the previous year and when they are younger and have a smaller size. To establish causal interpretation, we conduct a full sample regression analysis, a Heckman selection model, a PSM analysis, entropy‐balanced matching and a set of placebo tests. Overall, our results suggest that side‐by‐side management distracts firm‐level fund managers’ time and attention, weakens advising and monitoring and distorts the fund performance. Diversification beyond expertise may not always benefit investors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Management
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.70006
Primary Topic
Private Equity and Venture Capital
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Agency Costs of Side‐by‐side Management: Evidence from the Hedge Fund and Private Equity Industry

Douglas J. Cumming, H.D. Choi, Jay Hyun Lee, Qingjie Du
British Journal of Management
Private Equity and Venture Capital
article

The Agency Costs of Side‐by‐side Management: Evidence from the Hedge Fund and Private Equity Industry

Douglas J. Cumming, H.D. Choi, Jay Hyun Lee, Qingjie Du
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the impact of the simultaneous management of private equity on hedge fund performance. We derive theoretical predictions based on bounded rationality theory and agency theory. We first examine the firm characteristics driving the side‐by‐side decision. We show that the ‘side‐by‐side’ managed hedge funds underperform their peers. The underperformance is more pronounced when the side‐by‐side managed funds have different styles, when they perform worse in the previous year and when they are younger and have a smaller size. To establish causal interpretation, we conduct a full sample regression analysis, a Heckman selection model, a PSM analysis, entropy‐balanced matching and a set of placebo tests. Overall, our results suggest that side‐by‐side management distracts firm‐level fund managers’ time and attention, weakens advising and monitoring and distorts the fund performance. Diversification beyond expertise may not always benefit investors.

British Journal of ManagementVol. 37(1)
Stevens Institute of Technology (US), Birmingham City University (GB), University College Birmingham (GB), European Corporate Governance Institute (BE), Jusung Engineering (South Korea) (KR), University of Birmingham (GB), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Private Equity and Venture Capital
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Agency Costs of Side‐by‐side Management: Evidence from the Hedge Fund and Private Equity Industry — Douglas J. Cumming, H.D. Choi, et al. · British Journal of Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS