Teaching Students With and Without Learning Disabilities to Use a Scientific Argumentative Writing Strategy in Inclusive Science Classes

In inclusive science classrooms, Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) have changed how science is taught in recent years. For example, students are now taught scientific concepts and practices that involve using complex skills such as argumentation and reasoning and then applying these skills during writing activities. Unfortunately, students with learning disabilities (SWLD) often experience difficulties with scientific reasoning and argumentation as well as writing skills. To address these concerns, a scientific argumentative writing intervention was developed comprised of an argumentative strategy and a graphic organizer. Seventy high school biology students, 19 of whom were SWLD, were randomly assigned to either the experimental or the control group. Students in the experimental group were taught the intervention. Findings showed that students in the experimental group outperformed students in the control group on the amount of text written and the quality of their essays. Limitations of the study, as well as implications for teachers, are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning Disabilities Research and Practice
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09388982251359640
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching Students With and Without Learning Disabilities to Use a Scientific Argumentative Writing Strategy in Inclusive Science Classes

Danielle M. Frith, Joseph R. Boyle, Hannah E. Robinson, Latesha Watson
Learning Disabilities Research and Practice
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

Teaching Students With and Without Learning Disabilities to Use a Scientific Argumentative Writing Strategy in Inclusive Science Classes

Danielle M. Frith, Joseph R. Boyle, Hannah E. Robinson, Latesha Watson
article en

Abstract

In inclusive science classrooms, Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) have changed how science is taught in recent years. For example, students are now taught scientific concepts and practices that involve using complex skills such as argumentation and reasoning and then applying these skills during writing activities. Unfortunately, students with learning disabilities (SWLD) often experience difficulties with scientific reasoning and argumentation as well as writing skills. To address these concerns, a scientific argumentative writing intervention was developed comprised of an argumentative strategy and a graphic organizer. Seventy high school biology students, 19 of whom were SWLD, were randomly assigned to either the experimental or the control group. Students in the experimental group were taught the intervention. Findings showed that students in the experimental group outperformed students in the control group on the amount of text written and the quality of their essays. Limitations of the study, as well as implications for teachers, are discussed.

Learning Disabilities Research and PracticeVol. 41(1)
Monmouth University (US), Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.