Shifting news values to value voice: the case of social housing residents in Australian news media throughout 2020

Conventional news values are not well attuned to provide voice that matters for those who are socially marginalised, including residents of social housing in Australia. As a result, news media can legitimise and entrench inequalities and injustices. In this article we examine social housing resident voice in media reporting during the COVID-19 pandemic, identifying constraints on resident voice and indicating rarer instances where alternative models that value resident voice appear. We analysed over 700 newspaper articles published in 2020, and found conventional news hierarchies of attention marginalise and devalue the voice of social housing residents through two processes: limiting residents to speaking about personal experience; and portraying residents as vulnerable through stigmatising discourses. These processes consistently undermine residents’ expertise. To develop more just alternatives in a context of ongoing housing crisis, we argue it is necessary to value voices of social housing residents as experts and challenge stigmatising discourses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media International Australia
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878x251359743
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shifting news values to value voice: the case of social housing residents in Australian news media throughout 2020

Danielle Hynes, Tanja Dreher
1 citations
Media International Australia
Media Studies and Communication
3.86
article

Shifting news values to value voice: the case of social housing residents in Australian news media throughout 2020

Danielle Hynes, Tanja Dreher
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Conventional news values are not well attuned to provide voice that matters for those who are socially marginalised, including residents of social housing in Australia. As a result, news media can legitimise and entrench inequalities and injustices. In this article we examine social housing resident voice in media reporting during the COVID-19 pandemic, identifying constraints on resident voice and indicating rarer instances where alternative models that value resident voice appear. We analysed over 700 newspaper articles published in 2020, and found conventional news hierarchies of attention marginalise and devalue the voice of social housing residents through two processes: limiting residents to speaking about personal experience; and portraying residents as vulnerable through stigmatising discourses. These processes consistently undermine residents’ expertise. To develop more just alternatives in a context of ongoing housing crisis, we argue it is necessary to value voices of social housing residents as experts and challenge stigmatising discourses.

Media International Australia
National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE), UNSW Sydney (AU)
University of New South Wales
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Media Studies and Communication
3.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Shifting news values to value voice: the case of social housing residents in Australian news media throughout 2020 — Danielle Hynes, Tanja Dreher · Media International Australia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS