Development and analysis of quantitative models for predicting false alarms and missed detections in smoke detection systems

Substantial amounts of sensor data were processed by Machine Learning (ML) models to expose trends and patterns distinguishing genuine fire alarms from false signals. Such models improve the accuracy of fire alarm systems with the ability to detect infinitesimal changes in smoke readings, environmental conditions, and sensor patterns with history-based training. This improves overall fire safety by reducing false alarms and correcting earlier warnings. To forecast the precision of smoke sensor detection, the current research applied Bagging C and Histogram Gradient Boosting Classification (HGBC) models. These models were hybridized using Victoria Amazonica Optimization (VAO) and Smell Agent Optimization (SAO) to enhance prediction results and develop novel hybrid models with enhanced precision and realism. Comparative results for various phases, like training, testing, and all phases, were obtained to identify the most efficient model. For example, the HGVA model with 0.937 recall and the BAVA model with 0.965 recall were found to be the optimal models in this study, performing better than the BASA model throughout the testing process. It is also notable that 15 parameters like temperature, humidity, TVOC, CO2, UTC, and others influenced the performance of the models. In particular, the performance of the top three models was most affected by temperature, humidity, and UTC. The Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to analyze the effect of each of these factors to see which one had the greatest effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intelligent Decision Technologies
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/18724981251360377
Primary Topic
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and analysis of quantitative models for predicting false alarms and missed detections in smoke detection systems

Pingping Zhang, Junjie Liu, Ruiqin Zhao
Intelligent Decision Technologies
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
article

Development and analysis of quantitative models for predicting false alarms and missed detections in smoke detection systems

Pingping Zhang, Junjie Liu, Ruiqin Zhao
article en

Abstract

Substantial amounts of sensor data were processed by Machine Learning (ML) models to expose trends and patterns distinguishing genuine fire alarms from false signals. Such models improve the accuracy of fire alarm systems with the ability to detect infinitesimal changes in smoke readings, environmental conditions, and sensor patterns with history-based training. This improves overall fire safety by reducing false alarms and correcting earlier warnings. To forecast the precision of smoke sensor detection, the current research applied Bagging C and Histogram Gradient Boosting Classification (HGBC) models. These models were hybridized using Victoria Amazonica Optimization (VAO) and Smell Agent Optimization (SAO) to enhance prediction results and develop novel hybrid models with enhanced precision and realism. Comparative results for various phases, like training, testing, and all phases, were obtained to identify the most efficient model. For example, the HGVA model with 0.937 recall and the BAVA model with 0.965 recall were found to be the optimal models in this study, performing better than the BASA model throughout the testing process. It is also notable that 15 parameters like temperature, humidity, TVOC, CO2, UTC, and others influenced the performance of the models. In particular, the performance of the top three models was most affected by temperature, humidity, and UTC. The Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to analyze the effect of each of these factors to see which one had the greatest effect.

Intelligent Decision Technologies
Henan University of Technology (CN), Henan Institute of Science and Technology (CN), Henan Polytechnic University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Fire Detection and Safety Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.