Sustainability Committee and <scp>ESG</scp> Performance: A Worldwide Evidence

ABSTRACT This study aims to examine the relationship between the sustainability committee and ESG performance. ESG performance is divided into three categories: ESG rating, ESG controversies, and ESG materiality. This research utilizes data from all companies worldwide listed in MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International), obtaining 1860 observations collected for the years 2022 and 2023, reflecting post‐Covid‐19 conditions. The least‐squares regression analysis model was employed in this study. The results of this study show that the sustainability committee has a positive and significant impact on ESG ratings and materiality. Additionally, the research provides further analysis by examining differences in board tier systems, profit‐loss status of firms, developed versus developing countries, and conducts robustness testing using methods such as coarsened exact matching, firm clustering test, and Heckman two‐stage to corroborate the results. This study does not utilize ESG performance proxies based on disclosure but employs a more complex ESG performance proxy, namely ESG ratings, ESG controversies, and ESG materiality based on data from MSCI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy & Development
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.70173
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainability Committee and ESG Performance: A Worldwide Evidence

Desi Adhariani, Iman Harymawan, Siti Nur Aini, Doddy Setiawan
4 citations
Business Strategy & Development
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
8.91
article

Sustainability Committee and ESG Performance: A Worldwide Evidence

Desi Adhariani, Iman Harymawan, Siti Nur Aini, Doddy Setiawan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aims to examine the relationship between the sustainability committee and ESG performance. ESG performance is divided into three categories: ESG rating, ESG controversies, and ESG materiality. This research utilizes data from all companies worldwide listed in MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International), obtaining 1860 observations collected for the years 2022 and 2023, reflecting post‐Covid‐19 conditions. The least‐squares regression analysis model was employed in this study. The results of this study show that the sustainability committee has a positive and significant impact on ESG ratings and materiality. Additionally, the research provides further analysis by examining differences in board tier systems, profit‐loss status of firms, developed versus developing countries, and conducts robustness testing using methods such as coarsened exact matching, firm clustering test, and Heckman two‐stage to corroborate the results. This study does not utilize ESG performance proxies based on disclosure but employs a more complex ESG performance proxy, namely ESG ratings, ESG controversies, and ESG materiality based on data from MSCI.

Business Strategy & DevelopmentVol. 8(3)
Sebelas Maret University (ID), Universitas Airlangga (ID), University of Indonesia (ID)
Direktorat Riset Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
8.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.