Direct evidentiality in the grammar of English: <i>must have</i> in a London dialect

Abstract The modal auxiliary form must plus perfect aspect ( must have +V- en ) has recently acquired the meaning of direct evidentiality in Multicultural London English, the new London dialect. Because the new meaning is a recent innovation we have a rare opportunity to witness its development at first hand, unlike earlier changes in the history of must. Our analysis supports the view that the classic definition of evidentiality in terms of information source is too narrow to explain the expression of evidentiality in spoken interaction, and that a broader definition in terms of epistemic authority is more appropriate. We argue that the direct evidential meaning is a coherent further step in the semantic changes undergone by must during its history. It represents a previously undocumented pathway in the grammaticalisation of evidentiality. It also supports the view that evidentiality is not a purely lexical phenomenon in English.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
English Language and Linguistics
Published
2025-07-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1360674325000036
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Direct evidentiality in the grammar of English: must have in a London dialect

Zoë Adams, David A. Hall, Jenny Cheshire
1 citations
English Language and Linguistics
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
6.13
article

Direct evidentiality in the grammar of English: must have in a London dialect

Zoë Adams, David A. Hall, Jenny Cheshire
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The modal auxiliary form must plus perfect aspect ( must have +V- en ) has recently acquired the meaning of direct evidentiality in Multicultural London English, the new London dialect. Because the new meaning is a recent innovation we have a rare opportunity to witness its development at first hand, unlike earlier changes in the history of must. Our analysis supports the view that the classic definition of evidentiality in terms of information source is too narrow to explain the expression of evidentiality in spoken interaction, and that a broader definition in terms of epistemic authority is more appropriate. We argue that the direct evidential meaning is a coherent further step in the semantic changes undergone by must during its history. It represents a previously undocumented pathway in the grammaticalisation of evidentiality. It also supports the view that evidentiality is not a purely lexical phenomenon in English.

English Language and Linguistics
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Aston University (GB), Stratford Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
6.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Direct evidentiality in the grammar of English: <i>must have</i> in a London dialect — Zoë Adams, David A. Hall, et al. · English Language and Linguistics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS